【24h】

A comparative analysis of management accounting systems' impact on lean implementation

机译:管理会计制度对精益实施影响的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lean principles and practices have been widely adopted by many companies since the early 1990s. These companies are now beginning to realise that traditional costing and accounting methods may hinder the lean initiatives that they are implementing. This raises an important question: "Which cost management and accounting approaches best support the newly implemented lean principles and practices?" This paper examines the relative impact of three different management accounting systems on lean manufacturing implementation through simulation modelling with a single performance metric - net income. Three management accounting alternatives included in this study: traditional management accounting (TMA), activity-based costing (ABC), and value stream costing (VSC). This study compares these three management accounting alternatives using process simulation and statistically designed experimental methods. The results demonstrate that VSC appears to provide a bridge between operational views and financial views of lean, which enhances the transfer of information from shop level to management level.
机译:自1990年代初以来,精益原则和实践已被许多公司广泛采用。这些公司现在开始意识到传统的成本核算和会计方法可能会阻碍他们实施的精益计划。这就提出了一个重要的问题:“哪种成本管理和会计方法可以最好地支持新实施的精益原则和实践?”本文通过具有单一绩效指标(净收入)的模拟建模,研究了三种不同的管理会计系统对精益制造实施的相对影响。本研究包括三种管理会计替代方法:传统管理会计(TMA),基于活动的成本核算(ABC)和价值流成本核算(VSC)。本研究使用过程仿真和统计设计的实验方法比较了这三种管理会计方法。结果表明,VSC似乎在精益的运营视图和财务视图之间架起了一座桥梁,从而增强了从车间到管理级别的信息传递。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号