首页> 外文期刊>Bioethics >HEART DISEASE AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY: ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE AETIOLOGY, PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF HEART DISEASE
【24h】

HEART DISEASE AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY: ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE AETIOLOGY, PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF HEART DISEASE

机译:心脏疾病和社会不平等:心脏病的病因,预防和治疗中的伦理问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Heart disease is a complex condition that is a leading cause of death worldwide. It is often seen as a disease of affluence, yet is strongly associated with a gradient in socio-economic status. Its highly complex causality means that many different facets of social and economic life are implicated in its aetiology, including factors such as workplace hierarchy and agricultural policy, together with other well-known factors such as what passes for individual 'lifestyle'. The very untangling of causes for heart disease thus inevitably raises social, moral and political issues. These include the proper role of the individual and of larger social forces in its aetiology, prevention and treatment. The construction of risk factors for heart disease likewise is enmeshed with questions of distributive justice in the responsible targeting of those at risk for heart disease, a debate which has received much overt attention in the medical literature, but less attention within the ethical literature. Strategies for addressing a condition of such complex causality can be highly diverse, from pharmaceutical to social interventions, and value issues attach to the choice and presentation of such strategies. For example, prevention strategies may raise complex issues of responsibility and of judgements of what it is to 'live well'. Further ethical debate on this highly political disease would be welcome.
机译:心脏病是一种复杂的疾病,是全球范围内主要的死亡原因。它通常被视为富裕疾病,但与社会经济地位的下降密切相关。其高度复杂的因果关系意味着社会和经济生活的许多不同方面都与它的病因有关,包括工作场所等级制度和农业政策等因素,以及其他众所周知的因素,例如个体“生活方式”的转变。因此,造成心脏病的原因非常复杂,不可避免地引发了社会,道德和政治问题。这些包括个人和更大的社会力量在其病因,预防和治疗中的适当作用。心脏病危险因素的构建同样涉及分配公正性问题,以负责任地瞄准有心脏病危险的人群,这一辩论在医学文献中得到了很多公开的关注,但是在伦理学文献中却很少受到关注。从药物干预到社会干预,应对这种复杂因果条件的策略可能千差万别,价值问题也伴随着此类策略的选择和提出。例如,预防策略可能会引发复杂的责任问题以及对“生活得好”的判断。关于这种高度政治疾病的进一步伦理辩论将受到欢迎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号