首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management >Comparative study on decentralised inventory policy and Vendor Managed Inventory with (r, Q) replenishment strategy
【24h】

Comparative study on decentralised inventory policy and Vendor Managed Inventory with (r, Q) replenishment strategy

机译:(r,Q)补充策略下的去中心化库存策略和供应商管理库存的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently, Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) has emerged as a significant development towards collaboration in supply chain management. This paper develops a model to compare the performance of VMI with the performance of decentralised inventory policy. A two-member (vendor and buyer) system implementing (r, Q) replenishment strategy with multi-period, uncertain and price-sensitive customer demand is considered. We find that under a certain cost condition, although VMI likely reduces the vendor's profit, it, compared with decentralised inventory policy, will decrease the retail price and consequently brings higher expected profit level for the buyer and the whole supply chain. However, if the cost condition is not satisfied, VMI will result in a higher retail price, possibly lead a lower expected profit for vendor and not necessarily lead to a higher expected profit for the buyer or the whole supply chain.
机译:最近,供应商管理库存(VMI)成为对供应链管理中的协作的重要发展。本文建立了一个模型来比较VMI的性能与分散库存策略的性能。考虑了一个具有(r,Q)补货策略的两人(卖方和买方)系统,该系统具有多周期,不确定和价格敏感的客户需求。我们发现,在一定成本条件下,尽管VMI可能会降低供应商的利润,但与分散库存策略相比,VMI会降低零售价格,从而为买方和整个供应链带来更高的预期利润水平。但是,如果不满足成本条件,VMI将导致更高的零售价格,可能导致卖方的预期利润降低,而不一定导致买方或整个供应链的预期利润更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号