首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >The value of E/Em ratio in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: Impact of acute load reduction: A comparative simultaneous echocardiographic and catheterization study.
【24h】

The value of E/Em ratio in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: Impact of acute load reduction: A comparative simultaneous echocardiographic and catheterization study.

机译:E / Em比值在估计左心室充盈压中的价值:急性负荷减少的影响:一项同时超声心动图和导管检查的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ratio of the early transmitral flow velocity to the early diastolic tissue velocity (E/Em) has been suggested as a reliable estimate of left ventricular diastolic pressures (LVDP). However, the evidence regarding the ability of E/Em to detect LVDP changes is relatively equivocal. Our aim was to evaluate the validity of the ratio following acute load reduction.68 consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography underwent LV catheterization and echocardiography simultaneously. Doppler signals of transmitral flow and spectral TD signals at the level of the mitral annulus were obtained before and directly after intravenous administration of nitroglycerin (NTG). The predictive ability of E/Em to identify elevated LVDP was modest (area under curve=0.71?.08, p<0.01). The index was more strongly associated with LVDP in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF)<55% (r=0.68; p<0.01) than in patients with normal EF. Following NTG, E/Em lacked any predictive potential for elevated LVDP whereas changes LVDP could not be reliably tracked using E/Em.The predictive capacity of E/Em for elevated LVDP was weak and declined significantly following acute reduction in LV load. Changes in LVDP were not reliably predicted by E/Em. The current findings derived from a real-world patient population with relatively high filling pressures indicate that E/Em may not be sufficiently robust to be employed as a single non-invasive estimate of LVDP nor for monitoring load reducing medical therapy.
机译:已建议早期传输流速与舒张早期组织速度之比(E / Em)作为左心室舒张压(LVDP)的可靠估计。但是,有关E / Em检测LVDP变化的能力的证据相对模糊。我们的目的是评估急性负荷减少后该比率的有效性。68位连续接受冠状动脉造影检查的患者同时接受了左心导管和超声心动图检查。在静脉注射硝酸甘油(NTG)之前和之后立即获得二尖瓣环水平的多普勒血流信号和频谱TD信号。 E / Em识别升高的LVDP的预测能力适中(曲线下面积= 0.71?.08,p <0.01)。与射血分数降低(EF)<55%(r = 0.68; p <0.01)的患者相比,该指数与LVDP的关联更强。在NTG后,E / Em缺乏对LVDP升高的任何预测潜力,而使用E / Em无法可靠地追踪LVDP的变化.E / Em对LVDP升高的预测能力很弱,并且在LV负荷急剧降低后显着下降。 E / Em无法可靠地预测LVDP的变化。来自现实世界中具有相对较高填充压力的患者群体的当前发现表明,E / Em可能不够强大,无法用作LVDP的单个非侵入性评估或用于监测减轻负荷的药物治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号