首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >Does an inflatable obstetric belt facilitate spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparae with epidural analgesia?
【24h】

Does an inflatable obstetric belt facilitate spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparae with epidural analgesia?

机译:硬膜外镇痛时,可膨胀的产科带是否有助于在原产妇自发阴道分娩?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether an inflatable obstetric belt, synchronised to apply uniform fundal pressure during a uterine contraction, reduces operative delivery rates when used in the second stage of labour. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Five hundred nulliparae with a singleton cephalic pregnancy at term and with an epidural in labour were recruited during the first stage and randomised at full dilatation. Standard care involved one hour passive second stage and one hour active pushing after which instrumental delivery was performed if delivery was not imminent. Those randomised to the belt group, in addition to standard care, had the inflatable obstetric belt for the whole second stage of labour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mode of delivery. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven of the 260 women in the belt group (42.7%) compared with 94 of the 240 in the control group (39.2%) had a spontaneous vertex delivery (P = 0.423). The lift-out instrumental delivery rate was similar between the two groups: 108 belts (41.5%), compared with 101 controls (42.1%) (P = 0.902), whereas rotational instrumental deliveries in the belt group were 26 belts (10%) compared with 36 controls (15%) (P = 0.09). Fifteen women (5.8%) in the belt group and nine women (3.8%) in the control group had a caesarean section in the second stage (P = 0.292). An intact perineum was more likely in the belt group (16.5% compared with 9.6%, P = 0.022) as was a third degree tear (6.5% compared with 0.4%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The inflatable obstetric belt did not significantly reduce operative delivery rates when used in this clinical setting in the second stage of labour.
机译:目的:评估在第二产程中使用可膨胀的产科带是否在子宫收缩期间同步施加均匀的基础压力,以降低手术分娩率。设计:随机对照试验。方法:在第一阶段募集了500例足月单胎头妊娠且硬膜外分娩的空腹产妇,并在完全扩张时随机分配。标准护理包括一小时的被动第二阶段和一小时的主动推举,此后如果不打算分娩,则进行器械分娩。除标准护理外,那些随机分配到腰带组的人在整个第二产程中都装有可充气的产科腰带。主要观察指标:分娩方式。结果:腰带组的260名女性中有111名(42.7%),而对照组的240名女性中有94名(39.2%)具有自发性顶点传递(P = 0.423)。两组的抬起器械交付率相似:108个皮带(41.5%),而对照组为101个(42.1%)(P = 0.902),而皮带组中的旋转器械交付为26个皮带(10%)。与36位对照(15%)相比(P = 0.09)。腰带组中有十五名妇女(5.8%),对照组中有九名妇女(3.8%)在第二阶段进行了剖腹产(P = 0.292)。腰带组会阴完整的可能性更高(16.5%,而9.6%,P = 0.022),三度撕裂(6.5%,而0.4%,P = 0.001)。结论:在第二产程的临床环境中使用充气产科腰带并没有显着降低手术分娩率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号