...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >Choosing options for ultrasound screening in pregnancy and comparing cost effectiveness: a decision analysis approach (see comments)
【24h】

Choosing options for ultrasound screening in pregnancy and comparing cost effectiveness: a decision analysis approach (see comments)

机译:选择妊娠期超声检查的选择方案并比较成本效益:一种决策分析方法(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost effectiveness of different programmes of routine antenatal ultrasound screening to detect four key fetal anomalies: serious cardiac anomalies, spina bifida, Down's syndrome and lethal anomalies, using existing evidence. DESIGN: Decision analysis was used based on the best data currently available, including expert opinion from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Working Party and secondary data from the literature, to predict the likely outcomes in terms of malformations detected by each screening programme. SETTING: Results applicable in clinics, hospitals or GP practices delivering antenatal screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of cases with a 'target' malformation correctly detected antenatally. RESULTS: There was substantial overlap between the cost ranges of each screening programme demonstrating considerable uncertainty about the relative economic efficiency of alternative programmes for ultrasound screening. The cheapest, but not the most effective, screening programme consisted of one second trimester ultrasound scan. The cost per target anomaly detected (cost effectiveness) for this programme was in the range 5,000 pound silver-109,000, pound silver but in any 1000 women it will also fail to detect between 3.6 and 4.7 target anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: The range of uncertainty in the costs did not allow selection of any one programme as a clear choice for NHS purchasers. The results suggested that the overall allocation of resources for routine ultrasound screening in the UK is not currently economically efficient, but that certain scenarios for ultrasound screening are potentially within the range of cost effectiveness reached by other, possibly competing, screening programmes. The model highlighted the weakness of available evidence and demonstrated the need for more information both about current practice and costs.
机译:目的:使用现有证据,比较不同程序的常规产前超声检查程序的成本效益,以检测四个关键的胎儿异常:严重的心脏异常,脊柱裂,唐氏综合症和致死性异常。设计:基于目前可获得的最佳数据(包括皇家妇产科学院的专家意见,工作组和文献的辅助数据),使用决策分析来预测每个筛查程序检测到的畸形可能的结果。地点:结果适用于诊所,医院或全科医生进行产前检查。主要观察指标:在产前正确检测出“目标”畸形的病例数。结果:每个筛查计划的成本范围之间存在很大的重叠,表明对于超声筛查替代计划的相对经济效率存在很大的不确定性。最便宜但不是最有效的筛查程序包括一分三个月的超声扫描。此程序检测到的每个目标异常的成本(成本效益)在5,000磅银至109,000磅银之间,但是在任何1000位女性中,它也将无法检测到3.6到4.7个目标异常。结论:费用的不确定性范围不允许选择任何一个程序作为NHS购买者的明确选择。结果表明,英国常规超声筛查的总体资源配置目前在经济上并不高效,但是某些超声筛查方案可能处于其他可能竞争的筛查计划所达到的成本效益范围之内。该模型强调了现有证据的不足,并表明需要更多有关当前实践和成本的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号