ObjectiveTo establish the long term outcomes of risk stratified management of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). BackgroundGuidelines for management of DTC lack a strong evidence base and expose patients to overtreatment. This prospective study of patients diagnosed with DTC between 1977 and 2012 describes the long term outcomes of a conservative risk stratified (AMES) management policy. MethodsOutcomes were analysed around patient and tumour characteristics, primary intervention (surgery?±?radioiodine (RAI)), in terms of mortality, recurrence and reintervention. ResultsMedian follow-up in 348 patients was 14 years: mean age 48 (range 10–91) years, 257 (73.9) female, 222 (68.3) papillary cancer, tumour size 3.4?±?2.0?cm (mean?±?SD). 89 (25.6) AMES high risk, 116 (33.3) TNM stage III/IV and 16 (4.6) had distant metastases. Primary surgery comprised lobectomy in 189 (54.3): 11 (5.8) patients had subsequent completion total thyroidectomy with cancer present in five. Primary nodal surgery was performed in 142 (40.8) patients. 35 (13.5) low and 43 (48.3) high risk patients received RAI following initial surgery. Overall disease specific survival (DSS) was 92.1 at 10 years and 90.7 at 20 years. DSS at 20 years was 99.2 in low risk cases. AMES risk scoring predicted both survival and recurrence. Patients receiving RAI and AMES high risk were significantly associated with increased risk of death and recurrence. ConclusionsRoutine total thyroidectomy and RAI are not justifiable for low risk DTC. Treatment should be tailored to risk and AMES risk stratification remains a simple reliable clinical tool.
展开▼
