...
首页> 外文期刊>therapeutic drug monitoring >Comparison of High Pressure Liquid Chromatography and Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay Methods in a Theophylline Pharmacokinetic Study
【24h】

Comparison of High Pressure Liquid Chromatography and Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay Methods in a Theophylline Pharmacokinetic Study

机译:Comparison of High Pressure Liquid Chromatography and Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay Methods in a Theophylline Pharmacokinetic Study

获取原文
           

摘要

High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) were compared in a theophylline pharmacokinetic study. Eight healthy subjects received single 600-mg oral doses of two different sustained-release theophylline formulations. Fourteen blood samples were collected over 57 h after each dose, and the serum was analyzed for theophylline using both HPLC and FPIA methods. In comparing the two formulations using HPLC, there was no statistical difference in the area under the curve (AUC), terminal rate constant (k), or time of peak. However, there was a 13percnt; difference in peak theophylline concentration (p 0.05). The same statistical conclusions were made for all parameters when using FPIA. When comparing the kinetic parameters determined with each assay, the AUC was 12percnt; greater and the k was 17percnt; smaller with FPIA (p 0.05). Orthogonal regression of all serum theophylline concentrations showed that FPIA = 1.04 HPLC plus; 0.20; r = 0.987, p 0.001. Stratification of serum theophylline concentrations into different ranges showed that FPIA overestimated the HPLC results in each range, but the percentage of overestimation was greater at lower concentrations (p 0.05). The use of FPIA seems appropriate in comparative studies of theophylline phar-macokinetics; however, the calculated kinetic parameters may differ slightly from those obtained with HPLC.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号