Accurate bushing analysis requires a locking free finite element formulation, an appropriate selection of the strain energy density function, and an adequate use of bulk modulus to assure numerical stability and accuracy. In this paper, the pressure projection finite element method is employed. The method projects displacement-calculated pressure onto a lower order pressure field, based on the Babuska-Brezzi condition, to avoid volumetric locking and pressure oscillation. Mooney-Rivlin and Cubic strain energy density functions are used to study the material effect on the predicted rubber behavior in tension-compression and shear deformation modes, and the need to use a higher order strain energy density function for bushing analysis is identified. The effect of bulk modulus on bonded rubber behavior in bushings with respect to bushing shape factor is studied, and the minimum allowable bulk modulus to impose incompressibility in bushing analysis is characterized. The load-deflection response of annular bushings subjected to axial, torsional, and radial deformations are analyzed and results are compared to linear approximations. An effort is made to demonstrate how a Mooney-Rivlin model cannot capture load-displacement nonlinearities in bushing axial and torsional deformations. Two- and three-dimensional results are compared and the applicability of two-dimensional analysis is discussed.
展开▼
