...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Influence of ice particle model on satellite ice cloud retrieval: Lessons learned from MODIS and POLDER cloud product comparison
【24h】

Influence of ice particle model on satellite ice cloud retrieval: Lessons learned from MODIS and POLDER cloud product comparison

机译:冰粒模型对卫星冰云检索的影响:从MODIS和POLDER云产品比较中学到的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The influence is investigated of the assumed ice particle microphysical and optical model on inferring ice cloud optical thickness (τ) from satellite measurements of the Earth's reflected shortwave radiance. Ice cloud τ are inferred, and subsequently compared, using products from MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) and POLDER (POLarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances). POLDER τ values are found to be substantially smaller than those from collocated MODIS data. It is shown that this difference is caused primarily by the use of different ice particle bulk scattering models in the two retrievals, and more specifically, the scattering phase function. Furthermore, the influence of the ice particle model on the derivation of ice cloud radiative forcing (CRF) from satellite retrievals is studied. Three sets of shortwave CRF are calculated using different combinations of the retrieval and associated ice particle models. It is shown that the uncertainty associated with an ice particle model may lead to two types of errors in estimating CRF from satellite retrievals. One stems from the retrieval itself and the other is due to the optical properties, such as the asymmetry factor, used for CRF calculations. Although a comparison of the CRFs reveals that these two types of errors tend to cancel each other, significant differences are still found between the three CRFs, which indicates that the ice particle model affects not only optical thickness retrievals but also CRF calculations. In addition to CRF, the effect of the ice particle model on the derivation of seasonal variation of τ from satellite measurements is discussed. It is shown that optical thickness retrievals based on the same MODIS observations, but derived using different assumptions of the ice particle model, can be substantially different. These differences can be divided into two parts. The first-order difference is mainly caused by the differences in the asymmetry factor. The second-order difference is related to seasonal changes in the sampled scattering angles and therefore dependent on the sun-satellite viewing geometry. Because of this second-order difference, the use of different ice particle models may lead to a different understanding of the seasonal variation of τ.
机译:研究了假定的冰粒微物理和光学模型对从地球反射短波辐射的卫星测量结果推断冰云光学厚度(τ)的影响。利用MODIS(中等分辨率成像光谱辐射仪)和POLDER(地球反射的极化和方向性)的产品来推断并比较冰云τ。发现POLDERτ值明显小于来自并置的MODIS数据的值。结果表明,这种差异主要是由于在两次反演中使用了不同的冰粒体积散射模型,更具体而言是散射相位函数。此外,研究了冰粒模型对从卫星反演中推导的冰云辐射强迫(CRF)的影响。使用检索和相关冰粒模型的不同组合来计算三组短波CRF。结果表明,与冰粒模型相关的不确定性可能会导致两种类型的误差,这些误差会从卫星检索中估算出CRF。一个源于检索本身,另一个源于用于CRF计算的光学特性,例如不对称因子。尽管对CRF的比较表明这两种类型的误差趋于相互抵消,但在三个CRF之间仍然发现了显着差异,这表明冰粒模型不仅影响光学厚度反演,而且影响CRF计算。除CRF外,还讨论了冰粒模型对从卫星测量得出的τ的季节性变化的影响。结果表明,基于相同的MODIS观测值但使用冰粒模型的不同假设得出的光学厚度取值可能会大不相同。这些差异可以分为两部分。一阶差异主要是由不对称因子的差异引起的。二阶差异与采样散射角的季节性变化有关,因此取决于卫星太阳视的几何形状。由于存在二阶差异,因此使用不同的冰粒模型可能会导致对τ的季节性变化的不同理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号