Validation of remote atopic dermatitis severity assessment with the Eczema Area and Severity Ondex in children using caregiver-provided photos and videos

摘要

Background/Objectives We sought to quantify the reliability and validity of remote atopic dermatitis (AD) severity assessment using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) applied to caregiver-provided photos (p-EASI) and videos (v-EASI). Methods Children (0-17 years) with a physician diagnosis of AD were recruited. Caregivers took photos and a video of their child's skin. A clinician scored in-person EASI on the same day, then p-EASI and v-EASI for each participant 10 days or more between ratings. Two additional clinicians scored p-EASI and v-EASI. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was employed to assess criterion validity using in-person EASI as the gold standard. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess interrater reliability of p-EASI and v-EASI. Results Fifty racially and ethnically diverse children (age mean +/- SD: 4.3 +/- 4.4 years; 42 female) with a range of AD severity (EASI: 6.3 +/- 6.4) and Fitzpatrick skin types (1-2: 9; 3-4: 60; 5-6: 31) were enrolled and received in-person EASI assessment. Fifty had p-EASI and 49 had v-EASI by the same in-person rater, and by two additional raters. The CCC and ICC for p-EASI were 0.89, 95 CI 0.83, 0.95 and 0.81, 95 CI 0.71, 0.89, respectively. The CCC and ICC for v-EASI were 0.75, 95 CI 0.63, 0.88 and 0.69, 95 CI 0.51, 0.81, respectively. Conclusions In this diverse population with a range of skin tones, p-EASI showed good criterion validity and good interrater reliability. v-EASI showed moderate to good criterion validity and moderate interrater reliability. Both may be reliable and valid options for remote AD severity assessment.