首页> 外文期刊>academic emergency medicine >The SQuID protocol (subcutaneous insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis): Impacts on ED operational metrics
【24h】

The SQuID protocol (subcutaneous insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis): Impacts on ED operational metrics

机译:The SQuID protocol (subcutaneous insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis): Impacts on ED operational metrics

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Studies using fast-acting subcutaneous (SQ) insulin analogs in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) have demonstrated efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, allowing treatment of mildto-moderate (MTM)-severity DKA patients in non- intensive care unit (ICU) settings. However, emergency department (ED) based studies are few, with limited exploration of impacts on operational metrics.Methods: We implemented the SQuID (Subcutaneous Insulin in Diabetic Ketoacidosis) protocol for adults with MTM-severity DKA in an urban academic ED, collecting data from August 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. We examined fidelity (frequency of required q2h glucose checks), safety (proportion of patients administered rescue dextrose for hypoglycemia), and ED length of stay (EDLOS) for the SQuID cohort compared to patients (non ICU) treated with a traditional insulin infusion. We also examined ICU admission rate among MTM-severity DKA patients after introduction of SQuID to two historical control periods (pre-intervention and pre-COVID). We used Mann- Whitney U to test for differences in EDLOS distributions, bootstrapped (n = 1000) confidence intervals (CIs) for EDLOS median differences, and the two sample z test for differences in ICU admissions.Results: We identified 177 MTM-severity DKA patients in the study period (78 SQ uID, 99 traditional cohort) and 163 preintervention and 161 pre- COVID historical control patients. Fidelity to the SQuID pathway was good, with glucose checks exceeding the q2 h requirement. We found no difference in the proportion of rescue dextrose administration compared to the traditional pathway. We observed significant reductions in median EDLOS for the SQuID cohort compared to the traditional cohort during the study period (-3.0, 95% CI -8.5 to -1.4), the preintervention period (-1.4, 95% CI -3.1 to -0.1), and the pre- COVID control period (-3.6, 95% CI -7.5 to -1.8). Conclusions: In this single-center study at an academic ED, treatment of patients with MTM-severity DKA with a SQ insulin protocol was effective, demonstrated equivalent safety, and reduced ED length of stay.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号