首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology >Assessing the chronic toxicity of atrazine, permethrin, and chlorothalonil to the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia cf. dubia in laboratory and natural river water.
【24h】

Assessing the chronic toxicity of atrazine, permethrin, and chlorothalonil to the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia cf. dubia in laboratory and natural river water.

机译:评估阿特拉津,苄氯菊酯和百菌清对cladoceran Ceriodaphnia的慢性毒性。比亚在实验室和天然河水中。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The majority of ecotoxicological data are generated from standard laboratory-based experiments with organisms exposed in nonflowing systems using highly purified water, which contains very low amounts of dissolved organic matter and suspended particulates. However, such experimental conditions are not ecologically relevant. Thus, there is a need to develop more realistic approaches to determining toxicity, including both lethal and sublethal effects. This research provides information on the effect of natural water constituents, such as suspended particulates and dissolved organic matter, in river water (RW) on the chronic toxicity (7-day reproductive impairment) of the pesticides atrazine, chlorothalonil, and permethrin to the freshwater cladoceran Ceriodaphnia cf. dubia. Standard bioassays were conducted under standard laboratory and more environmentally realistic conditions (using RW). The 7-day IC25 (reproduction impairment) values of atrazine, chlorothalonil, and permethrin to C. cf. dubia ranged from 862.4 to >1000, 51.3 to 66.4, and 0.19 to 0.23 μg/L, respectively. Using the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, atrazine is classified as moderately to highly toxic, whereas permethrin and chlorothalonil were both highly toxic. The presence of dissolved organic matter and suspended particles in natural RW did not significantly (p > 0.05) change the toxicity of any of the pesticides to C. cf. dubia compared with that tested in laboratory water (LW). For the tested pesticides, toxicity testing in LW provided an adequate estimate of the hazard posed.
机译:大多数生态毒理学数据是通过基于标准实验室的实验得出的,这些实验是使用高度纯净的水在非流动系统中暴露的生物所形成的,该水中含有极少量的溶解有机物和悬浮颗粒。但是,这种实验条件与生态无关。因此,需要开发更现实的方法来确定毒性,包括致死作用和亚致死作用。这项研究提供了有关河水(RW)中天然水成分(如悬浮颗粒和溶解的有机物)对农药at去津,百菌清和苄氯菊酯对淡水的慢性毒性(7天生殖损害)的影响的信息。锁骨角eri杜比亚在标准实验室和更符合环境要求的条件下(使用RW)进行标准生物测定。 r去津,百菌清和苄氯菊酯的7天IC25(繁殖障碍)值至C。 dubia的范围分别为862.4至> 1000、51.3至66.4和0.19至0.23μg/ L。使用全球化学品统一分类和标签制度,at去津被分类为中度到高毒性,而苄氯菊酯和百菌清均为高毒性。天然RW中溶解的有机物和悬浮颗粒的存在并没有显着(p> 0.05)改变任何农药对C.的毒性。 dubia与在实验室用水(LW)中测试的相比。对于被测农药,LW中的毒性测试提供了对所造成危害的充分估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号