首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Hip Surgery >Effect of Surgical Approach on Length of Stay, Cost, and Early Complication Rate in Total Hip Arthroplasty
【24h】

Effect of Surgical Approach on Length of Stay, Cost, and Early Complication Rate in Total Hip Arthroplasty

机译:手术方法对全髋关节置换术住院时间、费用和早期并发症发生率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a historically popular and successful operation. While many steps of the operation are consistent between practitioners, discussion around which approach constitutes the “best” approach for routine, primary THA remains an open question. Objective?The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the surgical approach on hospital length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, and complication rates. A multisurgeon review of a single hospital was conducted to evaluate three surgical approaches: superior (SA), posterior (PA), and direct anterior (DAA). Methods?All elective primary THAs performed between July 2013 and July 2016 were reviewed in an administrative database. Two surgeons performed SA, three surgeons performed PA, and two surgeons performed DAA. A total of 1,799 arthroplasties were analyzed: 980 (SA), 685 (PA), and 134 (DAA). Multivariate logistic, Poisson, and linear regression models were used to calculate the effects of each approach on LOS, cost, and per cent discharge home while adjusting for age, severity of illness scores, obesity, and smoking. Results?After adjusting for patient characteristics, mean LOS for SA (1.8 days) was lower than both PA (2.4, p?
机译:全髋关节置换术(THA)是一个在历史上受欢迎和成功操作。步骤之间的操作是一致的从业者,讨论哪种方法构成的“最好”的方法,主要仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。客观吗?确定手术方法的效果医院住院时间(洛杉矶)、医院成本,和并发症发生率。一个医院进行评估三个手术方法:上级(SA),后在2013年7月之间执行的选择性主要伴音音量2016年7月,在行政审查数据库。外科医生执行PA,和两个外科医生执行DAA。多元逻辑、泊松和线性的回归模型来计算每种方法对洛杉矶的影响、成本和每分出院回家而调整年龄,疾病严重程度评分、肥胖和吸烟。结果吗?特点,意味着洛杉矶SA(1.8天)2.4低于PA (p ? 0.001 < ?)和DAA (2.9,0.001 p < ?)和PA(2.4)低于DAA (2.9,0.001 p < ?)。比PA(738美元差异,p ? < ? 0.001)和DAA(2222美元差异,p ? < 0.001 ?),和爸爸是较低的比DAA(1420美元差异,p ? < ? 0.001)。(88.7%)和PA(86.1%)与一个关联离家的放电率高于DAA (78.4%,p ? = 0.002, p ? < ? 0.001,分别)。降低30天重新接纳吗(1.3%)相比,DAA (5.2%, p < ? 0.001)没有区别90天再入院观察。结论?SA是与洛杉矶下降有关,降低成本,增加的可能性相比PA和DAA出院回家没有增加的90天的再入院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号