...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. >Sequential clomiphene citrate/hMG versus hMG for ovulation induction in clomiphene citrate-resistant women.
【24h】

Sequential clomiphene citrate/hMG versus hMG for ovulation induction in clomiphene citrate-resistant women.

机译:顺序克罗米芬柠檬酸盐/ hMG与hMG对比hMG对耐克罗米芬的妇女的排卵诱导。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study was designed to compare sequential clomiphene citrate/hMG regimen to hMG regimen for ovulation induction in clomiphene citrate-resistant women.A comparative prospective study.Ninety infertile women were randomized to receive either sequential CC/hMG regimen (45 women) or low-dose step-up protocol of hMG (45 women). All participants had received at least six consecutive cycles of clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction within the last year before inclusion in this study, but they did not conceive. The CC/hMG regimen group received clomiphene citrate 100 mg/day for 5 days, followed by hMG 75 IU for 4 days. The hMG group received low-dose step-up protocol for 10-14 days. To detect the number and size of the follicles, TVS was done on cycle day 8 and repeated daily or every other day according to follicular development. When one to three follicles reached a diameter ≥18 mm, hCG injection was scheduled. Before hCG injection, the E2 level and endometrial thickness were evaluated. β-hCG levels were measured on cycle day 22.There was no significant difference between the two studied groups regarding the demographic data, sperm parameters, and day 3 FSH, LH and estradiol. Also, there was no significant difference between the two studied groups regarding endometrial thickness, number of mature follicles, peak of E2 before hCG injection and number of cases that developed ovarian cyst or OHSS. The dose of gonadotropins used was significantly low in the CC/hMG group compared to the hMG group (295.2 ± 75.5 vs. 625.3 ± 65.0, respectively), and the pregnancy rate was significantly high in the CC/hMG group compared to the hMG group [12 (26.7 %) vs. 3 (6.7 %), respectively, p < 0.05].The sequential CC/hMG regimen is as effective as hMG regimen for ovulation induction, produces satisfactory pregnancy results and reduces the treatment cost.
机译:本研究旨在比较柠檬酸克罗米芬耐药患者的序贯柠檬酸克罗米芬/ hMG方案与hMG方案在诱导排卵方面的比较性前瞻性研究。随机选择了90例不育妇女接受连续CC / hMG方案(45名妇女)或低剂量hMG的剂量递增方案(45名妇女)。在纳入本研究前的最后一年内,所有参与者均已接受了至少六个连续的柠檬酸克罗米酚连续周期诱导排卵,但他们并未怀孕。 CC / hMG方案组每天接受100毫克/天的克罗米芬治疗5天,然后接受75 IU的hMG治疗4天。 hMG组接受低剂量升压方案持续10-14天。为了检测卵泡的数量和大小,在第8个周期进行TVS,并根据卵泡发育每天或隔天重复一次。当一到三个卵泡直径≥18 mm时,计划进行hCG注射。注射hCG之前,评估E2水平和子宫内膜厚度。在第22个周期的第22天测量β-hCG水平。两组的人口统计学数据,精子参数以及第3天的FSH,LH和雌二醇之间均无显着差异。此外,两组之间在子宫内膜厚度,成熟卵泡数目,hCG注射前E2的峰值以及发生卵巢囊肿或OHSS的病例数方面也没有显着差异。与hMG组相比,CC / hMG组所用的促性腺激素剂量明显较低(分别为295.2±75.5和625.3±65.0),而CC / hMG组与hMG组相比,妊娠率显着较高[12(26.7%)vs. 3(6.7%),p <0.05]。顺序的CC / hMG方案与hMG方案在诱导排卵方面一样有效,可产生令人满意的妊娠结果并降低治疗费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号