首页> 外文期刊>Health technology assessment: HTA >Dasatinib and nilotinib for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukaemia: A systematic review and economic evaluation
【24h】

Dasatinib and nilotinib for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukaemia: A systematic review and economic evaluation

机译:达沙替尼和nilotinib imatinib-resistant或不宽容的慢性骨髓性白血病:系统评价和经济评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a form of cancer affecting the blood, characterised by excessive proliferation of white blood cells in the bone marrow and circulating blood. In the UK, an estimated 560 new cases of CML are diagnosed each year. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness of dasatinib and nilotinib in the treatment of people with imatinib-resistant (ImR) and imatinib-intolerant (ImI) CML. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness literature, a review of manufacturer submissions and a critique and exploration of manufacturer submissions for accelerated phase and blast crisis CML were carried out and a decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dasatinib and nilotinib in chronic phase CML. Systematic review methods: Key databases were searched for relevant studies from their inception to June 2009 [MEDLINE (including MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations), EMBASE, (ISI Web of Science) Conference Proceedings Citation Index and four others]. One reviewer assessed titles and abstracts of studies identified by the search strategy, with a sample checked by a second reviewer. The full text of relevant papers was obtained and screened against the full inclusion criteria independently by two reviewers. Data from included studies were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Clinical effectiveness studies were synthesised through narrative review. Economic evaluation methods: Cost-effectiveness analyses reported in manufacturer submissions to the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence were critically appraised and summarised narratively. In addition, the models for accelerated phase and blast crisis underwent a more detailed critique and exploration. Two separate decisionanalytic models were developed for chronic phase CML, one simulating a cohort of individuals who have shown or developed resistance to normal dose imatinib and one representing individuals who have been unable to continue imatinib treatment owing to adverse events. One-way, multiway and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore structural and parameter uncertainty. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the systematic review. Chronic phase: effectiveness data were limited but dasatinib and nilotinib appeared efficacious in terms of obtaining cytogenetic response and haematological response in both ImR and ImI populations. In terms of cost-effectiveness, it was extremely difficult to reach any conclusions regarding either agent in the ImR population. All three models (Novartis, PenTAG and Bristol-Myers Squibb) were seriously flawed in one way or another, as a consequence of the paucity of data appropriate to construct robust decision-analytic models. Accelerated and blast crisis: all available data originated from observational singlearm studies and there were considerable and potentially important differences in baseline characteristics which seriously undermined any process for making meaningful comparisons between treatments. Owing to a lack of available clinical data, de novo models of accelerated phase and blast crisis have not been developed. The economic evaluations carried out by the manufacturers of nilotinib and dasatinib were seriously undermined by the absence of evidence on high-dose imatinib in these populations. Limitations: The study has been necessarily constrained by the paucity of available clinical data, the differences in definitions used in the studies and the subsequent impossibility of undertaking a meaningful cost-effectiveness analyses to inform all policy questions. Conclusions: Dasatinib and nilotinib appeared efficacious in terms of obtaining cytogenetic and haematological responses in both ImR and ImI populations. It was difficult to reach any cost-effectiveness conclusions as a consequence of the paucity of the data. Future research should include a three
机译:背景:慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)种影响血液的癌症,特征白细胞的过度增殖在骨髓和血液循环。英国估计有560新发病例CML每年诊断。本研究旨在评估临床有效性和costeffectiveness达沙替尼和nilotinib治疗患者imatinib-resistant (ImR)和imatinib-intolerant(ImI) CML。文学、有效性评估制造商提交和批判探索制造商提交的加速阶段和CML是爆炸危机进行决策分析模型开发评估的成本效益达沙替尼和CML nilotinib在慢性阶段。系统评价方法:关键的数据库从他们寻找相关的研究2009年6月(MEDLINE(包括《盗梦空间》MEDLINE进程内和其他非索引引用)、EMBASE (ISI的科学)会议论文集引文索引名其他人)。摘要研究确定的搜索第二个战略,样品检查评论家。和筛选获得完整的包容由两个评论者独立标准。包括研究提取评论家和检查。有效性研究合成叙述审查。成本效益分析报告制造商提交国家健康和临床研究所批判性评价和总结故事体地。此外,模型和加速阶段爆炸危机进行了更详细的评论和探索。CML模型发展为慢性阶段,一个模拟一群人或正常剂量伊马替尼有了抗性和一个代表个人由于无法继续伊马替尼治疗不良事件。概率敏感性分析探讨结构和参数不确定性。结果:15研究中系统的回顾。但达沙替尼和nilotinib数据有限出现有效的获取细胞遗传学反应和血液学的反应ImR和ImI人群。成本效益,是极其困难的关于代理在得出任何结论ImR人口。尼斯和百时美施贵宝)严重有缺陷的以一种方式或另一种方式,作为的结果数据的缺乏适当的构造健壮的决策分析模型。来自爆炸危机:所有可用的数据观察singlearm研究和有相当大的和潜在的重要基线特征的差异严重破坏了任何过程进行有意义的对比治疗。缺乏足够的临床数据,新创模型的加速阶段,爆炸危机没有被开发出来。由制造商nilotinib和达沙替尼严重破坏了的缺乏证据的高剂量伊马替尼这些人群。被缺乏一定约束提供临床数据的差异定义的研究和使用后续不可能进行有意义的成本效益分析提供信息所有政策问题。nilotinib出现有效的获得细胞遗传学和血液学的反应和ImR ImI人群。很难达到成本效益结论由于缺乏数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号