...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart >Sirolimus-eluting stents, bare metal stents or coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with multivessel disease including involvement of the proximal left anterior descending artery: analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies study part 2 (ARTS-II).
【24h】

Sirolimus-eluting stents, bare metal stents or coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with multivessel disease including involvement of the proximal left anterior descending artery: analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies study part 2 (ARTS-II).

机译:析支架,金属裸支架冠状动脉旁路移植患者包括参与多血管疾病左冠状动脉前降近端:分析动脉血管再生第2部分(ARTS-II)治疗研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The The Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS)-II trial found no differences in survival or overall adverse events between sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and the surgical arm of ARTS-I. Nevertheless, existing data suggest that patients with disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) may derive particular benefit from coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We therefore analysed the clinical outcome of patients in ARTS-I and ARTS-II with proximal LAD involvement. DESIGN: Multicentre observational study. SETTING: Forty-five European academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in ARTS-II with proximal LAD disease treated with SES (289/607, 48%) were compared with 187/600 (31%) bare metal stent patients (ARTS-I BMS) and 206/605 (34%) surgical patients (ARTS-I CABG) with proximal LAD involvement from ARTS-I. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after 3 years. RESULTS: The Arterial Revascularization Therapies study part 2 (ARTS-II) subgroup had better survival than both ARTS-I groups (ARTS-II 98.6% vs ARTS-I BMS 95.7%, p = 0.05 and vs ARTS-I CABG 94.7%, p = 0.01) and lower rates of the hard clinical composite endpoint of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (ARTS-II 3.1% vs ARTS-I BMS 9.6%, p = 0.002 and vs ARTS-I CABG 9.7%, p = 0.002). Although the ARTS-I CABG patients had a lower need for repeat revascularisation than ARTS-II (5.3% vs 13.1%, p = 0.002), the overall composite adverse event rates (death, myocardial infarction, stroke or any repeat revascularisation) were not significantly different between the ARTS-I CABG and ARTS-II patients (15.0% vs 18.0%, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: SES are not inferior to CABG or bare metal stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary disease including involvement of the proximal LAD.
机译:摘要目的:动脉血管再生治疗研究(艺术)——试验没有发现生存的差异或整体的不良事件析支架(SES)和之间外科ARTS-I的手臂。数据显示,患者的疾病左冠状动脉前降近端(小伙子)可以获得特别受益于冠状吗动脉旁路移植(CABG)。分析患者的临床结果ARTS-I和近端ARTS-II小伙子参与。设计:多中心观察研究。45欧洲学术医院。患者多支冠状动脉疾病。近端小伙子疾病治疗SES (289/607,48%)与187/600(31%)相比,裸露的金属支架病人(ARTS-I BMS)和206/605 (34%)手术病人(ARTS-I CABG)与近端小伙子从ARTS-I参与。主要不良心血管和脑血管事件后三年。血管再生疗法研究第2部分(ARTS-II)子群有更好的生存ARTS-I组(ARTS-II 98.6% vs ARTS-I BMS 95.7%,p = 0.05和vs ARTS-I搭桥94.7%,p = 0.01)低利率的临床综合死亡或非致命性心肌的端点梗死(ARTS-II 3.1% vs ARTS-I BMS 9.6%, p =0.002和vs ARTS-I搭桥9.7%,p = 0.002)。虽然ARTS-I CABG患者较低需要重复比ARTS-II血管形成(5.3%比13.1%,p = 0.002),整体综合不良事件率(死亡,心肌梗塞、中风或任何重复血管)没有显著ARTS-I CABG和ARTS-II之间的不同病人(15.0%比18.0%,p = 0.4)。SES并不次于CABG或裸金属支架患者的治疗多支冠状动脉疾病包括参与的下回proximal .

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号