首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, A. Space Physics: JGR >Reanalysis of the Ionospheric Total Electron Content Anomalies Around the 2011 Tohoku-Oki and 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes: Lack of a Clear Precursor of Large Earthquakes
【24h】

Reanalysis of the Ionospheric Total Electron Content Anomalies Around the 2011 Tohoku-Oki and 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes: Lack of a Clear Precursor of Large Earthquakes

机译:再分析电离层总电子2011日本东北部大,内容异常2016熊本地震:缺乏一个清晰的大地震的前兆

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigate the veracity of the reports by Iwata and Umeno (2016, https://doi. org/10.1002/2016ja023036) and Iwata and Umeno (2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ja023921), both of which claimed that the observed perturbations in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-based ionospheric total electron content (TEC) could serve as a "precursor" of large earthquakes based on correlation analysis. Iwata and Umeno (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ja023036) defined a spatial correlation of residuals between the observed and predicted TEC time series. They reported that the correlation value is significantly larger before large earthquakes than those observed during nonearthquake periods. Iwata and Umeno (2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ja023921), who applied the same method to other large earthquake, claimed that the preseismic ionospheric disturbances can be distinguished from other non-earthquake phenomena based on the small percentage of area where the correlation value exceeds the criterion. They also claimed that the low propagation velocity of the correlation peaks is also a preseismic characteristic. Here we tested their claims using a larger data set. As a result, these three characteristics they claimed to have captured as evidence of earthquake precursors are not significant being frequently observed during normal (nonearthquake) days. In addition to that, the criteria of Iwata and Umeno (2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ja023921) cannot be applied to the large earthquake discussed by Iwata and Umeno (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ja023036), and vice versa. Therefore, we can find no basis for claiming that they detected precursors to the earthquakes. The calculation procedure of the correlation function shows that the value is more of an indicator that amplifies small variations synchronized between nearby stations, like medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances rather than earthquake precursors.
机译:我们调查的报告的真实性org/10.1002/2016ja023036)和岩田聪和Umeno(2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ja023921),两者都声称在全球导航卫星扰动系统(GNSS)的电离层总电子内容(TEC)可以作为“前兆”基于相关分析的大地震。https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ja023036)定义了一个空间相关性之间的残差观察和预测TEC时间序列。报道称,相关值大地震前大很多比观察nonearthquake时期。https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ja023921),同样的方法应用于其他大型地震,声称preseismic电离层扰动可以区分从其他non-earthquake现象的基础上一小部分相关的地方值超过标准。的传播速度低相关峰也是一个preseismic的特点。一个更大的数据集。他们声称已经捕获的特点地震前兆的证据重要的期间经常被观察到正常(nonearthquake)天。岩田聪的标准和Umeno (2017https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ja023921)不能应用于大地震了https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ja023036)和副。声称他们发现前兆地震。相关函数显示,更有价值放大的小变化的一个指标附近的车站,之间同步中等规模的旅行电离层扰动而不是地震前兆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号