...
首页> 外文期刊>Nanoscale >Genotoxicity of metal oxide nanomaterials: review of recent data and discussion of possible mechanisms
【24h】

Genotoxicity of metal oxide nanomaterials: review of recent data and discussion of possible mechanisms

机译:基因毒性的金属氧化物纳米材料:审查最近的数据和讨论可能的机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Nanotechnology has rapidly entered into human society, revolutionized many areas, including technology, medicine and cosmetics. This progress is due to the many valuable and unique properties that nanomaterials possess. In turn, these properties might become an issue of concern when considering potentially uncontrolled release to the environment. The rapid development of new nanomaterials thus raises questions about their impact on the environment and human health. This review focuses on the potential of nanomaterials to cause genotoxicity and summarizes recent genotoxicity studies on metal oxide/silica nanomaterials. Though the number of genotoxicity studies on metal oxide/silica nanomaterials is still limited, this endpoint has recently received more attention for nanomaterials, and the number of related publications has increased. An analysis of these peer reviewed publications over nearly two decades shows that the test most employed to evaluate the genotoxicity of these nanomaterials is the comet assay, followed by micronucleus, Ames and chromosome aberration tests. Based on the data studied, we concluded that in the majority of the publications analysed in this review, the metal oxide (or silica) nanoparticles of the same core chemical composition did not show different genotoxicity study calls (i.e. positive or negative) in the same test, although some results are inconsistent and need to be confirmed by additional experiments. Where the results are conflicting, it may be due to the following reasons: (1) variation in size of the nanoparticles; (2) variations in size distribution; (3) various purities of nanomaterials; (4) variation in surface areas for nanomaterials with the same average size; (5) differences in coatings; (6) differences in crystal structures of the same types of nanomaterials; (7) differences in size of aggregates in solution/media; (8) differences in assays; (9) different concentrations of nanomaterials in assay tests. Indeed, due to the observed inconsistencies in the recent literature and the lack of adherence to appropriate, standardized test methods, reliable genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials is still challenging.
机译:纳米技术已迅速进入人体社会,彻底改变了许多领域,包括技术、医药和化妆品。由于许多有价值和独特的属性呢纳米材料具有的。属性可能会考虑的问题考虑可能不受控制的释放环境。纳米材料对他们提出了疑问对环境和人类健康的影响。综述纳米材料的潜力导致基因毒性和总结了最近基因毒性研究金属氧化物/二氧化硅纳米材料。研究金属氧化物/二氧化硅纳米材料最近仍然有限,这个端点为纳米材料得到了更多的关注,相关的出版物的数量增加了。分析这些同行评议的出版物在近20年来显示测试用来评估这些的基因毒性纳米材料是彗星试验,紧随其后微核,艾姆斯和染色体畸变测试。在大多数出版物的分析在这个评论,金属氧化物(或石英)纳米粒子的化学核心作文没有显示不同的基因毒性研究(正面或负面)的电话相同的测试,虽然有些结果是不一致的,需要得到额外的确认实验。它可能是由于以下原因:(1)纳米颗粒大小的变化;粒度分布的变化;纳米材料的纯度;表面纳米材料具有相同的领域平均大小;不同的晶体结构相同类型的纳米材料;解决方案/媒体的总量;在化验;纳米材料在试验测试。观察最近的文献中不一致并遵守适当的缺乏,标准化的测试方法,可靠的基因毒性评估纳米材料仍然是具有挑战性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号