...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of General Psychiatry >Collaborative depression care management and disparities in depression treatment and outcomes.
【24h】

Collaborative depression care management and disparities in depression treatment and outcomes.

机译:协作性抑郁症的护理管理抑郁症的治疗和预后之间的差距。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Collaborative depression care management (DCM), by addressing barriers disproportionately affecting patients of racial/ethnic minority and low education, may reduce disparities in depression treatment and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of DCM on treatment disparities by education and race/ethnicity in older depressed primary care patients. DESIGN: Analysis of data from the randomized controlled trial Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial (PROSPECT). SETTING: Twenty primary care practices. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 396 individuals 60 years or older with major depression. We conducted model-based analysis to estimate potentially differential intervention effects by education, independent of those by race/ethnicity (and vice versa). INTERVENTION: Algorithm-based recommendations to physicians and care management by care managers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antidepressant use, depressive symptoms, and intensity of DCM over 2 years. RESULTS: The PROSPECT intervention had a larger and more lasting effect in less-educated patients. At month 12, the intervention increased the rate of adequate antidepressant use by 14.2 percentage points (pps) (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 26.4 pps) in the no-college group compared with a null effect in the college-educated group (-9.2 pps [95% CI, -25.0 to 2.7 pps]); at month 24, the intervention reduced depressive symptoms by 2.6 pps on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (95% CI, -4.6 to -0.4 pps) in no-college patients, 3.8 pps (95% CI, -6.8 to -0.4) more than in the college group. The intervention benefitted non-Hispanic white patients more than minority patients. Intensity of DCM received by minorities was 60% to 70% of that received by white patients after the initial phase but did not differ by education. CONCLUSIONS: The PROSPECT intervention substantially reduced disparities by patient education but did not mitigate racial/ethnic disparities in depression treatment and outcomes. Incorporation of culturally tailored strategies in DCM models may be needed to extend their benefits to minorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier for PROSPECT: NCT00279682.
机译:背景:抑郁症治疗协作管理(DCM),通过解决障碍不成比例影响病人的种族/民族和低教育,可以减少之间的差距抑郁症的治疗和预后。检查扩张型心肌病治疗的影响教育和种族差异老年抑郁初级护理病人。随机对照的数据分析审判在初级保健预防自杀老人:协作试验(前景)。二十个初级护理实践。共有396名60岁以上抑郁症。分析评估潜在的差异通过教育干预效果,独立的的种族/民族(反之亦然)。干预:算法的建议医生和保健护理管理经理。主要结果测量:抗抑郁药物的使用,抑郁症状,DCM强度除以2年。在更低的更大、更持久的影响病人。14.2的速度足够的抗抑郁药使用百分点(pps)(95%置信区间(CI), 1.7到26.4 pps)没有大学组相比之下,一个空的效果受过大学教育集团(-9.2 pps (95% CI, -25.02.7 pps]);减少了2.6 pp的抑郁症状汉密尔顿抑郁量表(95% CI, -4.6-0.4 pps)没有大学的病人,3.8 pps (95%CI, -6.8 - -0.4)超过大学组。干预受益非西班牙裔白人患者超过少数患者。DCM受到少数民族的60%到70%病人在最初收到的白色教育阶段,但没有不同。结论:可能干预大大减少了病人的差异但没有缓解种族/民族教育抑郁症的治疗和预后之间的差距。文化整合的策略可能需要扩展他们在DCM模型利益的少数民族。前景clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00279682。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号