...
首页> 外文期刊>Antiviral therapy >Distinct signature type I interferon responses are determined by the infecting virus and the target cell.
【24h】

Distinct signature type I interferon responses are determined by the infecting virus and the target cell.

机译:独特的I型特征性干扰素应答是由感染病毒和靶细胞决定的。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Type I interferons (IFN) include multiple IFN-alpha subtypes which exhibit considerable amino acid identity and activate the same cell-surface receptor. The promoter regions of the IFN-alpha genes, however, have different transcription factor binding sites, implying differential transcriptional activation. Evolutionary conservation of multiple subtypes may have resulted from external pressures associated with the crucial nature of an IFN response, namely that different viruses that are tropic for different target tissues determine the nature and extent of an IFN response, specifically the IFN-alpha subtype profile. METHODS: Studies were undertaken to examine inducible IFN gene expression profiles in response to infection with single-stranded RNA viruses: Sendai virus (SeV), murine hepatitis virus (MHV-1) and coxsackie virus B3 (CVB3). RESULTS: In vitro, distinct signature profiles of SeV and MHV-1-inducible gene expression for IFN-alpha2, IFN-alpha4 and IFN-alpha5 subtypes in L2 and L929 mouse fibroblast cells, in relation to the extent and kinetics of their induction, were identified. In vivo, whereas A/J mice are highly permissive for both MHV-1 and CVB3 infections and mount a poor IFN response, C57B1/6 mice are relatively resistant to both virus infections and mount a vigorous IFN response. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the infecting virus and the target cell type dictate the extent and signature of inducible type I IFN gene expression. The extent of IFN response to viral infection influences the subsequent biological outcome: a robust IFN response prescribes a level of resistance, whereas a poor IFN response contributes towards a permissive phenotype for infection.
机译:背景:I型干扰素(IFN)包含多种IFN-α亚型,它们表现出可观的氨基酸同一性并激活相同的细胞表面受体。但是,IFN-α基因的启动子区域具有不同的转录因子结合位点,暗示差异转录激活。多种亚型的进化保守性可能是由与IFN反应的关键性质相关的外部压力导致的,即,针对不同目标组织的不同病毒决定了IFN反应的性质和程度,特别是IFN-α亚型分布。方法:进行了研究以检查对单链RNA病毒感染的诱导型IFN基因表达谱:仙台病毒(SeV),鼠肝炎病毒(MHV-1)和柯萨奇病毒B3(CVB3)。结果:SeV和MHV-1诱导型L2和L929小鼠成纤维细胞亚型中IFN-alpha2,IFN-alpha4和IFN-alpha5亚型的体外表达特征谱与它们的诱导程度和动力学有关,被确定。在体内,虽然A / J小鼠对MHV-1和CVB3感染都高度允许,并且干扰素反应较差,但C57B1 / 6小鼠对两种病毒感染都相对耐药,并且干扰素较强。结论:这些数据表明感染病毒和靶细胞类型决定了诱导型I IFN基因表达的程度和特征。 IFN对病毒感染的反应程度会影响随后的生物学结果:强大的IFN反应可规定耐药水平,而较差的IFN反应则可导致允许的表型感染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号