首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral and experimental economics >What drives charitable donations of time and money? The roles of political ideology, religiosity, and involvement
【24h】

What drives charitable donations of time and money? The roles of political ideology, religiosity, and involvement

机译:是什么推动了时间和金钱的慈善捐款? 政治意识形态,宗教和参与的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We use data from the first wave of the Panel Study on American Religion and Ethnicity to estimate a multivariate sample selection model of charitable giving of time and money highlighting the roles of political ideology, religiosity, political and social involvement, and diversity in personal relationships while controlling for other factors commonly identified in the scholarly work on philanthropic behavior. Our findings provide no evidence that political conservatives are more charitable than political liberals as advanced by Brooks (2006). To the contrary, our results suggest that at least in terms of volunteering, political conservatives are less charitable than political liberals. We also find evidence that the adverse impacts of political conservatism on charitable behavior are exacerbated by the increasing importance of religion/religious faith in one's life. These results, together with robust findings of significant and positive independent effects of other participation, involvement, and diversity variables, imply that charitable actions are both practice-driven and ideology-driven and somewhat at odds with the findings of Vaidyanathan et al. (2011).
机译:我们使用第一批关于美国宗教和种族研究的数据中的数据来估算慈善时间和金钱的多元样本选择模型,强调了政治意识形态,宗教信仰,政治和社会参与的作用,以及在人际关系中的多样性,而多样性控制有关慈善行为的学术工作中通常确定的其他因素。我们的发现没有提供证据表明政治保守派比布鲁克斯(Brooks,2006)提出的政治自由主义者更慈善。相反,我们的结果表明,至少在志愿服务方面,政治保守派不如政治自由主义者慈善。我们还发现证据表明,政治保守主义对慈善行为的不利影响会因宗教/宗教信仰在人生中的重要性而加剧。这些结果,加上其他参与,参与和多样性变量的重大和积极独立效应的强大发现,这意味着慈善行动既是实践驱动的,又是意识形态驱动的,并且与Vaidyanathan等人的发现有所不同。 (2011)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号