...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood Pressure Monitoring >Effect of mechanical behaviour of the brachial artery on blood pressure measurement during both cuff inflation and cuff deflation
【24h】

Effect of mechanical behaviour of the brachial artery on blood pressure measurement during both cuff inflation and cuff deflation

机译:袖带充气和袖带放气期间肱动脉机械行为对血压测量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different mechanical behaviour of the brachial artery on blood pressure (BP) measurements during cuff inflation and deflation. METHODS: BP measurements were taken from each of 40 participants, with three repeat sessions under three randomized cuff deflation/inflation conditions. Cuff pressure was linearly deflated and inflated at a standard rate of 2-3 mmHg/s and also linearly inflated at a fast rate of 5-6 mmHg/s. Manual auscultatory systolic and diastolic BPs, and pulse pressure (SBP, DBP, PP) were measured. Automated BPs were determined from digitally recorded cuff pressures by fitting a polynomial model to the oscillometric pulse amplitudes. The BPs from cuff deflation and inflation were then compared. RESULTS: Repeatable measurements between sessions and between the sequential order of inflation/deflation conditions (all P>0.1) indicated stability of arterial mechanical behaviour with repeat measurements. Comparing BPs obtained by standard inflation with those from standard deflation, manual SBP was 2.6 mmHg lower (P<0.01), manual DBP was 1.5 mmHg higher (P<0.01), manual PP was 4.2 mmHg lower (P<0.001), automated DBP was 6.7 mmHg higher (P<0.001) and automatic PP was 7.5 mmHg lower (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference for any automated BPs between fast and standard cuff inflation. The statistically significant BP differences between inflation and deflation suggest different arterial mechanical behaviour between arterial opening and closing during BP measurement. CONCLUSION: We have shown that the mechanical behaviour of the brachial artery during BP measurement differs between cuff deflation and cuff inflation.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是研究腕带充气和放气期间肱动脉不同机械行为对血压(BP)测量的影响。方法:从40名参与者中的每位参与者进行BP测量,并在三种随机的袖带放气/充气条件下进行3次重复训练。袖带压力以2-3 mmHg / s的标准速率线性放气和充气,还以5-6 mmHg / s的快速速率线性充气。测量手动听诊的收缩压和舒张压以及脉压(SBP,DBP,PP)。通过将多项式模型拟合示波脉冲幅度,从数字记录的袖带压力中确定自动BP。然后比较袖带放气和充气引起的血压。结果:重复测量之间的会议之间和充气/放气条件的顺序顺序之间的重复测量(所有P> 0.1)表明动脉力学行为的稳定性。将通过标准充气获得的血压与通过标准放气获得的血压进行比较,手动SBP降低2.6 mmHg(P <0.01),手动DBP升高1.5 mmHg(P <0.01),手动PP降低4.2 mmHg(P <0.001),自动DBP自动PP降低了7.5 mmHg(P <0.001),高6.7 mmHg(P <0.001)。在快速和标准袖带充气之间,任何自动血压均无统计学上的显着差异。充气和放气之间的统计学上显着的BP差异表明,在BP测量期间,动脉打开和关闭之间的动脉力学行为不同。结论:我们已经发现,在袖带放气和袖带充气之间,肱动脉的机械行为在血压测量过程中是不同的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号