...
【24h】

Predictive Utility of thePenetration-AspirationScale inInter-ArytenoidInjection Augmentation

机译:渗透 - 抽吸规模ininter-arytenoid注入增强的预测效用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives/Hypothesis To determine the utility of preoperative penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) scores and clinical findings on modified barium swallow (MBS) in predicting advancement of diet after interarytenoid injection augmentation (IAIA). Study Design Retrospective review. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 372 consecutive patients who underwent IAIA for pharyngeal dysphagia between 2009 and 2019 were initially identified. Patients were excluded from the study if they had insufficient preop MBS, no postop MBS within 3 months of injection, supraglottoplasty, or underlying neurological condition. Ninety-three patients were included in the study. Pre- and postoperative PAS scores were recorded, as were pre and postop diets. PAS scores were calculated by a single pediatric speech and language pathologist. Results Average PAS score on MBS was 5.87 (standard deviation [SD] 2.74); median (range) = 8 (1-8). Postop average was 4.29 (SD 3.02); median (range) = 2 (1-8),P < .001. Those with worse preop PAS scores had increased odds of improvement in diet (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.49,P= .029). An improvement in PAS score of 3.0 or greater predicted an improvement in diet with a sensitivity of 76.7% and a specificity of 85.7%. Conclusions PAS score on MBS can be a useful tool when assessing pediatric patients who may be candidates for IAIA. Prospectively comparing PAS score in patients post-IAIA to patients solely undergoing diet modification can help to better objectively assess differences in outcomes and understand the full utility of PAS score. Level of Evidence Level III (Individual Cohort Study)Laryngoscope, 2020
机译:目的/假设确定术前穿刺抽吸量表(PAS)评分和改良吞钡法(MBS)的临床结果在预测杓间注射增强术(IAIA)后饮食改善方面的效用。研究设计回顾性回顾。方法在这项回顾性队列研究中,初步确定了2009年至2019年间连续372例因咽吞咽困难接受IAIA治疗的患者。如果患者在注射、声门上成形术后3个月内,术前MBS不足、术后MBS不足或基础神经系统状况不佳,则将其排除在研究之外。93名患者被纳入研究。记录术前和术后PAS评分,以及术前和术后饮食。PAS分数由一名儿科言语和语言病理学家计算。结果MBS的平均PAS评分为5.87(标准差[SD]2.74);中位数(范围)=8(1-8)。术后平均4.29(SD 3.02);中位数(范围)=2(1-8),P<0.001。术前PAS评分较差的患者饮食改善的几率增加(比值比1.24,95%可信区间[CI]1.02-1.49,P=0.029)。PAS评分提高3.0或更高预示着饮食改善,敏感性为76.7%,特异性为85.7%。结论MBS上的PAS评分在评估可能成为IAIA候选者的儿科患者时是一个有用的工具。前瞻性比较IAIA后患者和单纯饮食调整患者的PAS评分,有助于更好地客观评估结果差异,并了解PAS评分的全部效用。证据水平三级(个体队列研究)喉镜,2020年

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号