...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Risk Factors for Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures An Analysis of 1456 Vertebrae Augmented by Low-Viscosity Bone Cement
【24h】

Risk Factors for Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures An Analysis of 1456 Vertebrae Augmented by Low-Viscosity Bone Cement

机译:骨质疏松椎体压缩骨髓椎体成形术水泥泄漏的危险因素骨折1456椎体骨水泥增强1456椎体的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design. Retrospective study. Objective. To identify risk factors for cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) using low-viscosity bone cement for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Summary of Background Data. Cement leakage is the most common complication for PVP and its risk factors have been discussed. However, data in previous series were heterogeneous. Additionally, relative smaller patient sample or more types of cement leakage classified in those studies made the results conflicting. Methods. A total of 1090 patients who underwent PVP with low-viscosity bone cement for OVCFs in 1456 levels between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters potentially affecting the occurrence of cement leakage were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Cement leakage was assessed using postoperative computed tomography scanning, and classified into two types (cortical leakage and venous leakage) considering the mechanism. Results. The incidence of cortical and venous leakage were 20.3% (295/1456) and 56.2% (819/1456), respectively. Cortical disruption, basivertebral foramen were the strongest risk factors for cortical leakage (P = 0.000), venous leakage (P = 0.000), respectively. Greater cement volume is one risk factor for both cortical leakage and venous leakage. The intravertebral cleft, solid type of cement distribution were significant risk factors for cortical leakage, and they both were protective factors for venous leakage. For cortical leakage, older age and trauma were another two risk factors. For venous leakage, female was another one risk factor, and higher grade of fracture severity is the strongest protective factor. Conclusion. Both cortical leakage and venous leakage are prevalent. Adequate known of risk factors could help balance the incidence of two type leakage in unique vertebra and reduce the incidence of leakage in general in PVP for OVCFs.
机译:研究设计。回顾性研究。客观的研究骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)经皮椎体成形术(PVP)中使用低粘度骨水泥时水泥渗漏的危险因素。背景数据摘要。骨水泥渗漏是PVP最常见的并发症,其危险因素已被讨论。然而,前一系列的数据是异质的。此外,在这些研究中,相对较小的患者样本或更多类型的水泥渗漏导致结果相互矛盾。方法。回顾性分析了2016年1月至2019年6月期间共1090例OVCFs患者接受了1456个水平的低粘度骨水泥PVP治疗。使用单变量和多变量分析评估可能影响水泥泄漏发生的参数。通过术后计算机断层扫描评估骨水泥渗漏,并根据其机制分为两种类型(皮质渗漏和静脉渗漏)。后果皮质和静脉渗漏的发生率分别为20.3%(295/1456)和56.2%(819/1456)。皮质破裂、基底椎孔分别是皮质渗漏(P=0.000)和静脉渗漏(P=0.000)的最强危险因素。较大的骨水泥量是皮质渗漏和静脉渗漏的一个风险因素。椎体内裂隙、固体类型的骨水泥分布是皮质渗漏的重要危险因素,它们都是静脉渗漏的保护因素。对于皮质渗漏,年龄大和创伤是另外两个危险因素。对于静脉渗漏,女性是另一个危险因素,骨折严重程度越高,保护性最强。结论皮质渗漏和静脉渗漏都很普遍。充分了解风险因素有助于平衡独特椎体的两种渗漏发生率,并降低OVCFs PVP中的渗漏发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号