...
首页> 外文期刊>ANS. Advances in nursing science >Perspective by Jane Koziol-Mclain, PHD, RN and Emma Davies, PHD.
【24h】

Perspective by Jane Koziol-Mclain, PHD, RN and Emma Davies, PHD.

机译:PHD,RN的Jane Koziol-Mclain和PHD的Emma Davies的观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Once upon a time (JKM) was emotionally spouting off about the flagrant flaws of a particular publication. A wise mentor listened quietly and then asked, "How would you have done it differently?" In the case of article "The Politics" by Perron et al, I consider this challenge. I declare that I personally support a critical analysis of the spill over of the "war on terror" in nursing. In this case though, the challenge is not in the argument itself, but in the naming of a particular program as an exemplar. I ask myself, would I have named the school? Does the fact that the program is easily identifiable on the Internet mean that it did not need to be named, or on the contrary, would it be silly not to? And perhaps more central, was identification of the single program vital to the argument?
机译:曾几何时(JKM)情绪高涨地谈论着特定出版物的明显缺陷。一位明智的导师静静地听着,然后问:“您将如何做不同的事情?”对于Perron等人的文章“ The Politics”,我考虑了这一挑战。我声明我个人支持对护理“反恐战争”溢出的批评性分析。但是,在这种情况下,挑战不在于参数本身,而在于将特定程序命名为示例。我问自己,我要给学校起名吗?该程序可以在Internet上轻松识别的事实是否意味着它不需要命名,或者相反,它却很愚蠢?也许更重要的是,确定单个程序对论点至关重要吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号