...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood Pressure Monitoring >Does the white-coat effect in people of African and South Asian descent differ from that in White people of European origin? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
【24h】

Does the white-coat effect in people of African and South Asian descent differ from that in White people of European origin? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机译:非洲人和南亚人后裔的白大褂效应与欧洲血统的白人有什么不同吗?系统的审查和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the white-coat effect in people of African (Blacks) and South Asian descent differs from that of people of European origin (Whites), and if so, whether this explains demonstrated ethnic variations in blood pressure. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out using Medline 1966-2003, Embase 1980-2003, and citations from references. The meta-analysis was performed using the Cochrane review manager software (RevMan version 4.2; Oxford, UK). RESULTS: Eight studies were examined, four studies from the UK and four from the USA. The mean systolic and diastolic white-coat effect was similar in Blacks and Whites. The weighted mean difference in systolic white-coat effect was 0.31 [confidence interval 95% (CI)=-1.96, 2.57; P=0.79] and in diastolic white-coat effect was 0.18 (95% CI=-1.70, 1.35; P=0.82). Two studies reported on South Asians. Both systolic and diastolic white-coat effect was significantly lower in South Asians than in Whites; the weighted mean difference in systolic white-coat effect was -8.90 (95% CI=-13.04, -4.76; P<0.0001) and in diastolic white-coat effect was -4.66 (95% CI=-7.29, -2.03; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The blood pressure differences between Blacks and Whites are unlikely to be a result of variations in white-coat effect. In contrast, the slightly lower clinic blood pressure in some South Asian populations such as Bangladeshis might be partly caused by a low white-coat effect but more studies are needed in this subject.
机译:目的:评估非洲人(黑人)和南亚裔人的白大褂效应是否与欧洲血统(白人)的人不同,如果有,这是否可以说明血压存在种族差异。方法:使用Medline 1966-2003,Embase 1980-2003和参考文献中的引文进行系统的文献综述。荟萃分析使用Cochrane评论管理器软件(RevMan版本4.2;英国牛津)进行。结果:检查了八项研究,其中四项来自英国,四项来自美国。黑人和白人的平均收缩期和舒张期白大褂效应相似。收缩期白衣效应的加权平均差为0.31 [置信区间95%(CI)=-1.96,2.57; P = 0.79],并且在舒张期白涂层中的作用为0.18(95%CI = -1.70,1.35; P = 0.82)。有两项研究报道了南亚人。南亚人的收缩期和舒张期白大衣效应均明显低于白人。收缩期白衣效应的加权平均差为-8.90(95%CI = -13.04,-4.76; P <0.0001),舒张期白衣效应的加权平均差为-4.66(95%CI = -7.29,-2.03; P <0.0001)。结论:黑人和白人之间的血压差异不太可能是由于白大衣效果的差异所致。相比之下,一些南亚人群(例如孟加拉国)的临床血压略低可能部分是由于白大衣效应低引起的,但是对此主题需要进行更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号