...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Volatile Anesthesia Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Narrative Review on the Technical Challenges and Considerations
【24h】

Volatile Anesthesia Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Narrative Review on the Technical Challenges and Considerations

机译:挥发性麻醉与心肺旁路期间的总静脉内麻醉:关于技术挑战和考虑的叙述审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Mortality in Cardiac Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial of Volatile Anesthetics (MYRIAD) demonstrated that cardiac surgery with either volatile anesthesia or intravenous anesthesia techniques can be comparable with respect to morbidity and mortality. Maintaining anesthesia during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with either approach requires appreciation of the nuances that are unique to each. This narrative review addresses these technical challenges and other considerations. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:心脏外科手术死亡率挥发性麻醉剂随机对照试验(MYRIAD)表明,使用挥发性麻醉剂或静脉麻醉技术的心脏外科手术在发病率和死亡率方面具有可比性。无论哪种方法,在体外循环(CPB)期间维持麻醉都需要了解每种方法独特的细微差别。这篇叙述性评论讨论了这些技术挑战和其他考虑因素。(C) 2020爱思唯尔公司版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号