首页> 外文期刊>Journal of addiction medicine >Rejection of Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Referred for Post-acute Medical Care Before and After an Anti-discrimination Settlement in Massachusetts
【24h】

Rejection of Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Referred for Post-acute Medical Care Before and After an Anti-discrimination Settlement in Massachusetts

机译:在马萨诸塞州的反歧视结算前后,对阿片类药物使用障碍的患者的排斥反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Objectives: To determine how commonly medical inpatients with opioid use disorder (OUD) referred for postacute medical care were rejected due to substance use or treatment with opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Additionally, to assess for changes in rejection rates following the United States Attorney's May 2018 settlement with a Massachusetts nursing facility for violating anti-discrimination laws for such rejections. Methods: We linked electronic referrals to private Massachusetts postacute medical care facilities from Boston Medical Center in 2018 with clinical data. We included referrals with evidence of OUD using ICD-10 diagnosis codes or OAT receipt. We identified the frequency of referrals where the stated rejection reason was substance use or OAT and classified these as discriminatory. We used segmented regression to assess for changes in proportion of referrals with substance use and OAT-related rejections before and after the settlement. Results: In 2018, 219 OUD-associated hospitalizations resulted in 1648 referrals to 285 facilities; 81.8% (1348) were rejected. Among hospitalizations, 37.4% (82) received at least 1 discriminatory rejection. Among rejections, 15.1% (203) were discriminatory (105 for OAT and 98 for substance use). Among facilities, 29.1% (83) had at least one discriminatory rejection. We found no differences in proportion of discriminatory rejections before and after the settlement. Conclusions: Individuals hospitalized with OUD frequently experience explicit discrimination when rejected from postacute care despite federal and state protections. Efforts are needed to enhance enforcement of anti-discrimination laws, regulations, and policies to ensure access to postacute medical care for people with OUD and ongoing medical needs.
机译:补充数字内容可在文本中获得。目的:确定因药物使用或阿片激动剂治疗(OAT)而被拒绝接受急性后医疗护理的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)住院患者的常见情况。此外,评估2018年5月美国检察官与马萨诸塞州一家护理机构达成和解后,拒绝率的变化,因为该机构违反了反歧视法。方法:2018年,我们将电子转诊与波士顿医疗中心提供的马萨诸塞州公立医疗机构联系起来,并提供临床数据。我们使用ICD-10诊断代码或OAT收据将有OUD证据的转诊包括在内。我们确定了所述拒绝原因为药物使用或OAT的转诊频率,并将其归类为歧视性转诊。我们使用分段回归来评估治疗前后药物使用和燕麦相关排斥反应的转诊比例的变化。结果:2018年,219例OUD相关住院导致1648例转诊至285家机构;81.8%(1348人)被拒绝。在住院患者中,37.4%(82人)至少接受了1次歧视性排斥。在拒绝中,15.1%(203人)具有歧视性(105人使用燕麦,98人使用药物)。在设施中,29.1%(83)至少有一次歧视性拒绝。我们发现,在和解前后,歧视性拒绝的比例没有差异。结论:尽管有联邦和州的保护措施,但因OUD住院的患者在被拒绝接受急救后护理时经常会受到明显的歧视。需要努力加强反歧视法律、法规和政策的执行,以确保有OUD和持续医疗需求的人获得产后医疗护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号