首页> 外文期刊>The South African Archaeological Bulletin >REVISITING KLASIES RIVER: A REPORT ON THE LARGE MAMMAL REMAINS FROM THE DEACON EXCAVATIONS OF KLASIES RIVER MAIN SITE, SOUTH AFRICA
【24h】

REVISITING KLASIES RIVER: A REPORT ON THE LARGE MAMMAL REMAINS FROM THE DEACON EXCAVATIONS OF KLASIES RIVER MAIN SITE, SOUTH AFRICA

机译:重新审视Klasies River:关于大型哺乳动物的报告仍然来自南非克莱斯河主场的Deagon挖掘

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Klasies River is arguably one of the most informative Middle Stone Age sites in Africa. Its extensive occupational sequence and the large quantity of faunal material, lithic artefacts, and Homo sapiens remains makes this a key site to explore modern human evolution. Two major excavations of the Klasies sequence - the first by Singer and Wymer in 1967/68, and later by Hilary Deacon in the 1980s and 1990s-yielded a vast quantity of faunal material. However, interpretation of the Singer and Wymer fauna has been marred by flawed collection techniques. In contrast, all faunal remains from the Deacon collection were recovered and analysed with the potential to provide less biased results. Here, we report on the fauna from the Deacon assemblage, placing particular emphasis on the description of the material. We find that the 'Klasies pattern' - or an ungulate skeletal-part profile dominated by skulls and feet for larger bovids, with a more equitable skeletal-part distribution for smaller bovids - is not represented in the Deacon collection. The Klasies pattern was therefore likely caused by sampling bias. Generally, bovid remains dominate the assemblage, while seal and hyrax are the most common identified taxa. The palaeoenvironmental implication of the material is briefly discussed, which confirms the results from Klein's (1976) analysis of the Singer and Wymer collection.
机译:克拉西斯河可以说是非洲中石器时代信息最丰富的遗址之一。其广泛的职业序列和大量的动物群材料、石器文物和智人遗骸使其成为探索现代人类进化的关键地点。克拉斯序列的两次重大发掘——第一次是辛格和怀默在1967/68年进行的,后来是希拉里·迪肯在20世纪80年代和90年代进行的,发掘出了大量的动物资料。然而,对辛格和怀默动物群的解读受到了有缺陷的收集技术的破坏。相比之下,迪肯收集的所有动物遗骸都被回收并进行了分析,有可能提供不那么偏颇的结果。在这里,我们报告了迪肯集合中的动物群,特别强调了材料的描述。我们发现“Klasies模式”或有蹄类动物的骨骼部分轮廓在较大的牛的头骨和脚中占主导地位,较小的牛的骨骼部分分布更为均匀,但在执事收藏中并未出现。因此,Klasies模式可能是由抽样偏差引起的。总的来说,bovid遗迹在组合中占主导地位,而seal和hyrax是最常见的分类群。简要讨论了该材料的古环境含义,证实了克莱因(1976)对辛格和怀默收藏的分析结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号