首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >In-Hospital Complications following Arthrotomy versus Arthroscopy for Septic Knee Arthritis: A Cohort-Matched Comparison
【24h】

In-Hospital Complications following Arthrotomy versus Arthroscopy for Septic Knee Arthritis: A Cohort-Matched Comparison

机译:关节术后关注的患者与关节镜检查脓毒症关节炎:群组匹配比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a paucity of literature comparing the relative merits of open arthrotomy versus arthroscopy for the surgical treatment of septic knee arthritis. The primary goal of this study is to compare the risk of perioperative complications between these two surgical techniques. To this end, 560 patients treated for septic arthritis of the native knee with arthroscopy were statistically matched 1:1 with 560 patients treated with open arthrotomy. The outcome measures included major complications, minor complications, mortality, inpatient hospital charges, and length of stay (LOS). Major complications were defined as myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, postoperative shock, unplanned ventilation, deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, infected postoperative seroma, hospital acquired urinary tract infection, and retained surgical item. Minor complications included phlebitis and thrombophlebitis, postprocedural emphysema, minor surgical site infection, peripheral nerve complication, and intraoperative hemorrhage. Mortality data were extracted from the database using the Uniform Bill patient disposition. Complications were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, whereas mean costs and LOS were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis H-test. Major complications occurred in 3.8% of the patients in the arthroscopy cohort and 5.4% of the patients in the arthrotomy cohort (p?=?0.20). Too few patients in our sample died to report based on National (Nationwide) Impatient Sample (NIS) minimum reporting standards. Rates of minor complications were similar for the arthroscopy and arthrotomy cohorts (12.5 vs. 13.9%; p?=?0.48). Multivariate analysis did not reveal any greater risk of minor or major complication between the two procedures. Inpatient hospital cost was similar for arthroscopy (?=?$15,917; standard deviation [SD]?=?14,424) and arthrotomy (?=?$16,020; SD?=?18,665; p?=?0.42). LOS was also similar for both arthrotomy (6.78 days, SD?=?6.75) and arthroscopy (6.24 days, SD?=?5.95; p?=?0.23). Patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment of septic arthritis of the knee showed no difference in relative risk of perioperative complications, LOS, or hospital cost compared with patients who underwent open arthrotomy.
机译:对于脓毒性膝关节炎的外科治疗,比较开放性关节镜和关节镜的相对优点的文献很少。本研究的主要目的是比较这两种手术方法的围手术期并发症风险。为此,560名接受关节镜治疗的化脓性膝关节炎患者与560名接受开放性关节镜治疗的患者进行了1:1的统计学匹配。结果指标包括严重并发症、轻微并发症、死亡率、住院费用和住院时间(LOS)。主要并发症包括心肌梗死、心脏骤停、中风、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、肺炎、术后休克、计划外通气、深部手术部位感染、伤口裂开、术后血清瘤感染、医院获得性尿路感染和保留手术项目。轻微并发症包括静脉炎和血栓性静脉炎、术后肺气肿、轻微手术部位感染、周围神经并发症和术中出血。死亡率数据是使用统一账单患者处置从数据库中提取的。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型分析并发症,而使用Kruskal–Wallis H检验比较平均费用和服务水平。关节镜组和关节镜组的主要并发症发生率分别为3.8%和5.4%(p=0.20)。根据国家(全国)不耐烦样本(NIS)最低报告标准,我们样本中死亡的患者太少。关节镜组和关节镜组的轻微并发症发生率相似(分别为12.5%和13.9%;p=0.48)。多变量分析没有显示两种手术之间发生轻微或严重并发症的风险更大。关节镜检查(15917美元;标准差[SD]?=14424)和关节镜检查(16020美元;SD=18665美元;p=0.42)的住院费用相似。关节镜手术(6.78天,标准差=6.75)和关节镜手术(6.24天,标准差=5.95;p=0.23)的LOS也相似。接受膝关节化脓性关节炎关节镜治疗的患者与接受开放性关节镜手术的患者相比,围手术期并发症、LOS或住院费用的相对风险没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号