首页> 外文期刊>Polymer Composites >Tensile properties retention of aged carbon-FRP sheets made of fully and partially bio-based resins and conventional epoxy
【24h】

Tensile properties retention of aged carbon-FRP sheets made of fully and partially bio-based resins and conventional epoxy

机译:张力性能保持型碳-FRP片材的完全和部分生物 - 基于生物树脂和常规环氧树脂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article investigates the environmental aging of two types of bio-resin carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) through immersion in saltwater at various temperatures, and compares results to conventional epoxy (E)-CFRP. The two types are: a fully bio-resin, namely furfural alcohol (FA), derived from corn-cobs and sugarcane, and the second is a partial bio-resin, namely epoxidized pine oil blend (EP) extracted from pine tree sap. Control specimens showed that EP resin resulted in similar CFRP strength and modulus to E resin, whereas FA resin resulted in a 9% lower strength and 14% higher modulus. These were shown by the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to be statistically insignificant. After 240 days exposure, tensile strength retentions of EP-CFRP at 23 degrees C, 40 degrees C, and 50 degrees C were 97%, 98%, and 92%, respectively, while those of FA-CFRP were 83%, 81%, and 82%. For reference, retentions of E-CFRP were 101%, 90%, and 95%. ANOVA showed that the differences in retentions between EP- and E-CFRP are statistically insignificant at all temperatures, while the differences between FA- and E-CFRP are significant at 23 degrees C and 50 degrees C after 240 days only. Also, the reductions in strength over the 240 days for each resin type are insignificant, except for FA-CFRP at 50 degrees C. CFRP generally suffered remarkably less deterioration than glass-FRP at elevated temperatures, for both E and FA resins. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:2081-2092, 2018. (c) 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers
机译:本文研究了两种类型的生物树脂碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)在不同温度下浸泡在盐水中的环境老化,并与传统的环氧树脂(E)-CFRP进行了比较。这两种类型是:一种完全生物树脂,即糠醛醇(FA),来自玉米芯和甘蔗;另一种是部分生物树脂,即从松树树液中提取的环氧化松油混合物(EP)。对照试样显示,EP树脂的CFRP强度和模量与E树脂相似,而FA树脂的强度和模量分别降低9%和14%。方差分析(ANOVA)显示这些数据在统计学上不显著。暴露240天后,EP-CFRP在23℃、40℃和50℃下的抗拉强度保持率分别为97%、98%和92%,而FA-CFRP的抗拉强度保持率分别为83%、81%和82%。作为参考,E-CFRP的保留率分别为101%、90%和95%。方差分析表明,在所有温度下,EP-和E-CFRP之间的保留差异在统计学上均不显著,而FA-和E-CFRP之间的差异仅在240天后的23℃和50℃时显著。此外,除50℃下的FA-CFRP外,每种树脂在240天内的强度降低均不显著。对于E和FA树脂,CFRP在高温下的劣化程度通常明显低于玻璃纤维增强塑料。博莱姆。COMPOS。,39:2081-2092, 2018. (c) 2016年塑料工程师学会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号