首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine >THREE KINDS OF HUMILITY IN BIOETHICS CERTIFICATION
【24h】

THREE KINDS OF HUMILITY IN BIOETHICS CERTIFICATION

机译:生物伦理认证三种谦卑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The author's skepticism about certifying bioethicists has a 20-year history. The hazards of certification include doubts about whether an online, multiple-choice exam measures what is important in bioethical deliberation. Other worries include the potential neglect of informal reasoning processes used by patients and families, the creation of a false sense of expertise, and how certification can disenfranchise lay members of ethics committees. This essay does not seek to reverse the growing trend toward certification but urges humility both in the process of certification and in interpreting the results. Humility is here defined through the works of Judith Andre and Jack Coulehan. Three kinds of humility are described as important for bioethics work: epistemic, moral, and ontological. The current qualifications for taking the certification exam are discussed, and suggestions for a better approach are offered.
机译:作者对认证生物伦理学家持怀疑态度已有20年历史。认证的危害包括怀疑在线多项选择考试是否衡量了生物伦理审议中的重要内容。其他担忧包括可能忽视患者和家属使用的非正式推理过程,产生虚假的专业知识感,以及认证如何剥夺道德委员会非专业成员的权利。本文并不试图扭转认证日益增长的趋势,但敦促在认证过程中以及在解释结果时保持谦逊。谦逊在这里是通过朱迪思·安德烈和杰克·库勒汉的作品来定义的。三种谦逊被描述为对生命伦理学工作很重要:认知的、道德的和本体论的。讨论了目前参加认证考试的资格,并提出了更好的方法的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号