首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine >REVISITING THE DISTINCTION AND THE CONNECTION BETWEEN RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
【24h】

REVISITING THE DISTINCTION AND THE CONNECTION BETWEEN RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

机译:重新审视研究与实践之间的区别和联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Belmont Report addresses the distinction between practice and research as guidance for which activities should be evaluated prospectively by a research ethics committee. This essay argues that the distinction between clinical practice and clinical research has a more fundamental significance for understanding the ethics of clinical research. After discussing the important connections between clinical research and clinical practice, the essay examines in detail ethically significant differences between these two sorts of activities. This sets the stage for a critique of clinical equipoise, widely regarded as a fundamental principle of clinical research ethics.
机译:贝尔蒙特报告将实践和研究之间的区别作为指导,研究伦理委员会应前瞻性地评估哪些活动。本文认为,临床实践和临床研究之间的区别对于理解临床研究的伦理具有更根本的意义。在讨论了临床研究和临床实践之间的重要联系之后,本文详细分析了这两种活动在伦理上的显著差异。这为临床均势的批判奠定了基础,临床均势被广泛视为临床研究伦理的基本原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号