首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine >Ways of Debating Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Implications for Psychiatry.
【24h】

Ways of Debating Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Implications for Psychiatry.

机译:辩论辅助自杀和安乐死的方式:对精神病学的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) is permitted in a handful of jurisdictions. But its scope (ranging from being restricted to the end of life to no restrictions save those of autonomy) and its legal basis (ranging from a necessary prerogative of physicians to a human right) vary greatly. The debate over psychiatric EAS (pEAS) needs to be understood within this complex context. This essay addresses one specific aspect: can pEAS be grounded on a basic human right? The author argues against pEAS as grounded on a basic human right by showing that such a view has several implications we ought not accept.
机译:安乐死或协助自杀(EAS)在少数司法管辖区是允许的。但它的范围(从被限制到生命结束,到除了自治权以外没有任何限制)及其法律基础(从医生的必要特权到人权)差别很大。关于精神病EA(PEA)的争论需要在这个复杂的背景下理解。这篇文章讨论了一个具体方面:豌豆能否建立在基本人权的基础上?作者反对以基本人权为基础的豌豆,认为这种观点有几个我们不应该接受的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号