首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Prospective comparative study of knee laxity with four different methods in anterior cruciate ligament tears
【24h】

Prospective comparative study of knee laxity with four different methods in anterior cruciate ligament tears

机译:膝关节韧带四种不同方法的前瞻性比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Anterior knee laxity can be evaluated using different devices, the most commonly used being the TelosA (R), KT1000A (R), RolimeterA (R), and GNRBA (R). However, the laxity values obtained with these devices have never been compared to one another. As such, the outcomes of studies using these different knee laxity measurement devices may not be comparable. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the side-to-side laxity difference in patients with one ACL-injured knee, using each of these devices, and to compare the values obtained from each. We hypothesized that the measurements of laxity would vary depending on the device used.
机译:None

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号