...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ quality & safety >Managing competing demands Through task-switching and Multitasking: A multi-setting observational study of 200 clinicians over 1000 hours
【24h】

Managing competing demands Through task-switching and Multitasking: A multi-setting observational study of 200 clinicians over 1000 hours

机译:通过任务切换和多任务处理竞争需求:在1000个小时内对200位临床医生进行的多地点观察研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To provide a detailed characterisation of clinicians' work management strategies. Design 1002.3 h of observational data were derived from three previous studies conducted in a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, among emergency department (ED) doctors (n=40), ward doctors (n=57) and ward nurses (n=104). The rates of task-switching (pausing a task to handle an incoming task) and multitasking (adding a task in parallel to an existing task) were compared in each group. Random intercepts logistic regression was used to determine factors significantly associated with clinicians' use of task-switching over multitasking and to quantify variation between individual clinicians. Results Task-switching rates were higher among ED doctors (6.0 per hour) than ward staff (2.2 and 1.8 per hour for doctors and nurses, respectively) and vice versa for multitasking rates (9.2 vs 17.3 and 14.1 per hour). Clinicians' strategy use was significantly related to the nature and complexity of work and to the person they were working with. In some settings, time of day, day of the week or previous chosen strategy affected a clinician's strategy. Independent of these factors, there was significant variation between individual clinicians in their use of strategies in a given situation (ED doctors p=0.04, ward staff p=0.03). Conclusions Despite differences in factors associated with work management strategy use among ED doctors, ward doctors and ward nurses, clinicians in all settings appeared to prioritise certain types of tasks over others. Documentation was generally given low priority in all groups, while the arrival of direct care tasks tended to be treated with high priority. These findings suggest that considerations of safety may be implicit in task-switching and multitasking decisions. Although these strategies have been cast in a negative light, future research should consider their role in optimising competing quality and efficiency demands.
机译:目的详细描述临床医生的工作管理策略。设计1002.3小时的观察数据来自澳大利亚悉尼一家教学医院在急诊科(n = 40),病房医生(n = 57)和病房护士(n = 104)中进行的三项先前研究。 。在每个组中比较了任务切换(暂停任务以处理传入任务)和多任务(将任务与现有任务并行添加)的比率。随机截距逻辑回归用于确定与临床医生在多任务处理中使用任务切换显着相关的因素,并量化各个临床医生之间的差异。结果急诊医生的任务转换率(每小时6.0)高于病房工作人员(医生和护士分别为每小时2.2和1.8),多任务处理的反之亦然(每小时9.2、17.3和14.1)。临床医生的策略使用与工作的性质和复杂性以及与他们一起工作的人密切相关。在某些情况下,一天中的时间,星期几或先前选择的策略会影响临床医生的策略。独立于这些因素,在给定情况下,各个临床医生在使用策略方面存在显着差异(ED医生p = 0.04,病房人员p = 0.03)。结论尽管ED医生,病房医生和病房护士在与工作管理策略使用相关的因素上存在差异,但在所有情况下,临床医生似乎都将某些类型的任务优先于其他类型的任务。一般而言,在所有组别中,文件记录的优先级均较低,而直接护理任务的到达往往被优先处理。这些发现表明,在任务切换和多任务决策中可能隐含安全性的考虑。尽管这些策略被否定了,但未来的研究应考虑它们在优化竞争质量和效率需求方面的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号