首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Cost and efficacy of peripheral stem cell mobilization strategies in multiple myeloma
【24h】

Cost and efficacy of peripheral stem cell mobilization strategies in multiple myeloma

机译:多发性骨髓瘤周围干细胞动员策略的成本和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) can be performed using plerixafor, which is expensive, or high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCy). We hypothesized that the overall cost of mobilization with plerixafor might not be greater if the cost of complication management was considered. We performed a cost analysis of these two strategies. This multicentric observational study recruited patients with myeloma who underwent a first PBSC mobilization. We considered direct medical costs, including hospitalization, mobilization agents, apheresis, and supportive treatments. We included 111 patients, 54 and 57 in the HDCy and plerixafor groups, respectively. Cost of mobilization with HDCy was 5097 +/- 2982euro vs. 10958 +/- 1789euro for plerixafor (p < 0.0001). Cost of agents used was 1287 +/- 779euro vs. 6552 +/- 509euro, respectively (p = 0.0009). The mean number of days of hospitalization was 2 and 2.1 days, respectively (p = 0.035). All patients achieved the minimum PBSC collection target (p = 1.0); however, ASCT was performed with HDCy in 67% patients and with plerixafor in 86% (p = 0.02). Plerixafor mobilization incurred a greater cost, mostly due to the greater cost of the drug. Hospitalization length in the two groups was similar in our series. Interestingly, plerixafor appeared to be a very effective and safe mobilizing approach translating into a greater ASCT success.
机译:可以使用普罗兰料(PBSC)进行外周血干细胞(PBSC),其昂贵或高剂量环磷酰胺(HDCy)进行。我们假设如果考虑了复杂管理成本,那么通过Plerixafor调动的总成本可能不会更大。我们对这两种策略进行了成本分析。这种多中心观察研究招募了骨髓瘤患者,他们接受了第一次PBSC动员。我们考虑了直接的医疗费用,包括住院,动员剂,洗手组和支持性治疗。我们分别在HDCY和​​Plerixafor组中包含111名患者,54和57名。 HDCY的动员成本为5097 +/- 2982EURO与PlerixaFor(P <0.0001)的10958 +/- 1789euro。使用的代理成本分别为1287 +/- 779euro与6552 +/- 509euro(p = 0.0009)。住院的平均天数分别为2和2.1天(P = 0.035)。所有患者均达到最低PBSC收集目标(P = 1.0);然而,ASCT在67%的患者中用HDCY进行,并且在86%的玻璃素(P = 0.02)中进行。 Plerixafor Mobilization产生了更大的成本,主要是由于药物的成本更高。我们的系列中两组的住院长度相似。有趣的是,Plerixafor似乎是一个非常有效和安全的动员方法,转化为更大的ASCT成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号