...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural processes >Biparentally deserted offspring are viable in a species With intense sexual conflict over care
【24h】

Biparentally deserted offspring are viable in a species With intense sexual conflict over care

机译:在父母之间因照顾而发生强烈的性冲突的物种中,双亲荒废的后代是可行的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Desertion of clutch (or brood) by both parents often leads to breeding failure, since in vast majority of birds care by at least one parent is required for any young to fledge. Recent works in a highly polygamous passerine bird, the Eurasian penduline tit (Remiz pendulinus), suggest that biparental clutch desertion is due to intense sexual conflict over care. However, an alternative yet untested hypothesis for biparental desertion is low offspring viability so that the parents abandon the offspring that have poor prospect for survival. Here we test the latter hypothesis in a common garden experiment by comparing the viability of deserted and cared for eggs. We show that embryonic development does not differ between deserted and cared for eggs. Therefore, sexual conflict over care remains the best supported hypothesis for biparental clutch desertion in penduline tits. Our work points out that conflict over care is a potential - yet rarely considered - cause of biparental nest desertion, and a strong alternative for the traditional explanations of low offspring viability, human disturbance or deteriorating ambient environment. Apart from a handful of species, the intensity of sexual conflict has not been quantified, and we call for further studies to consider sexual conflict as a cause of nest desertion. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:父母双方放弃离合器(或育雏)通常会导致育种失败,因为在绝大多数鸟类中,任何幼雏都需要至少一位父母的照顾。最近在一个高度一夫多妻制的雀形目鸟类欧亚摆线雀(Remiz pendulinus)上进行的研究表明,双亲离婚是由于护理方面的激烈性冲突所致。但是,双亲遗弃的另一种尚未检验的假说是后代生存力低,因此父母放弃了存活前景差的后代。在这里,我们通过比较废弃和照顾卵子的生存力,在一个普通的花园实验中检验了后一种假设。我们表明,胚胎发育在被抛弃和照顾卵子之间没有区别。因此,在护理上的性冲突仍然是摆线山雀双亲离婚的最佳支持假设。我们的工作指出,护理冲突是双亲巢荒漠化的潜在原因,但很少被考虑,并且是对后代生存能力低,人为干扰或周围环境恶化的传统解释的有力替代方法。除了少数物种外,尚未评估性冲突的强度,我们呼吁开展进一步研究,以将性冲突视为巢穴荒漠的原因。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号