...
【24h】

Authors' response

机译:作者的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We would like to thank Dr Papageorgiou for his interest in our article. We are grateful for the opportunity to offer a few clarifications. While conducting and reporting this meta-analysis, we strictly followed the MOOSE statement, which was released in 2000 and is probably the only guideline for meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology.Compared with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses concerning prevalence (MCPs) are relatively new and rare in the literature. Variations in methodology are common. First, many authors of MCPs based their choice of summary methodology on the significance of heterogeneity, and we referred to them.
机译:我们要感谢Papageorgiou博士对我们的文章感兴趣。我们很高兴有机会提供一些澄清。在进行和报告这项荟萃分析时,我们严格遵循了MOOSE声明,该声明于2000年发布,可能是流行病学观察性研究的唯一荟萃分析指南。与随机对照试验的荟萃分析相比,荟萃分析关于患病率(MCP)在文献中相对较新且很少见。方法上的变化很普遍。首先,许多MCP的作者都是基于异质性的重要性来选择汇总方法的,我们将其称为“异质性”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号