...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin combination therapy versus pegylated interferon monotherapy in hemodialysis patients: A comparison of 2 sequentially treated cohorts
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin combination therapy versus pegylated interferon monotherapy in hemodialysis patients: A comparison of 2 sequentially treated cohorts

机译:聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b和利巴韦林联合治疗与聚乙二醇干扰素单药治疗在血液透析患者中​​的疗效和安全性:2个序贯治疗人群的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Pegylated interferon (peginterferon; interferon with an attached polyethylene glycol molecule) monotherapy is the recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis patients. Limited data concerning peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin treatment in this population are available. Study Design: 2 prospective observational cohort studies. Setting & Participants: From 2007-2009, a total of 26 patients received peginterferon alfa-2b monotherapy. From 2009-2012, an additional 26 patients were treated with peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. Predictors: Peginterferon alfa-2b monotherapy, 1.0 μg/kg/wk, versus peginterferon alfa-2b, 1.0 μg/kg/wk, and ribavirin, 200 mg, 3 times per week. Treatment durations were 24 and 48 weeks for HCV genotypes non-1 and 1, respectively. Outcomes & Measurements: End-of-treatment virologic response and sustained virologic response (SVR) were undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment and 24 weeks after treatment ended, respectively. SVR and treatment-related withdrawal rate were evaluated by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Severe anemia was defined as nadir hemoglobin level <8 g/dL. Results: Patients who received combination therapy had a higher end-of-treatment virologic response than patients who received monotherapy (85% vs 62% in ITT [P = 0.03] and 100% vs 80% in PP [P = 0.03]). The SVR rate was higher in the combination-treatment cohort than in the monotherapy cohort (62% vs 27% in ITT [P = 0.01] and 73% vs 35% in PP [P = 0.01]). Patients who received combination therapy had a significantly higher rate of severe anemia than those who received monotherapy (58% vs 27%; P = 0.03). However, treatment withdrawal rates were similar between the combination (15%) and monotherapy (23%) groups. Limitations: Comparison of 2 sequential cohorts rather than a randomized control study. Conclusions: Peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin combination therapy provided a higher SVR rate than peginterferon alfa-2b monotherapy for treatment-naive dialysis patients with chronic HCV infection through careful monitoring of hematologic parameters and ribavirin dose modification. Severe anemia was significantly higher in patients receiving combination therapy than patients treated with monotherapy.
机译:背景:乙二醇化干扰素(peginterferon;具有连接的聚乙二醇分子的干扰素)单一疗法是血液透析患者慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的推荐治疗方法。关于该人群中聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b和利巴韦林治疗的有限数据可用。研究设计:2项前瞻性观察队列研究。背景与参与者:从2007年至2009年,共有26例患者接受了聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b单药治疗。从2009年至2012年,另有26例患者接受了聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b和利巴韦林治疗。预测因素:聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b单一疗法1.0μg/ kg / wk,聚乙二醇干扰素alfa-2b 1.0μg/ kg / wk和利巴韦林200 mg,每周3次。 HCV基因型非1和1的治疗持续时间分别为24和48周。结果和测量:治疗结束时和治疗结束后24周,HCV RNA分别是治疗结束时的病毒学应答和持续病毒学应答(SVR)。通过意向治疗(ITT)和按方案(PP)分析评估了SVR和与治疗有关的戒断率。严重贫血定义为最低血红蛋白水平<8 g / dL。结果:接受联合疗法的患者比接受单一疗法的患者有更高的治疗后病毒学应答(ITT分别为85%vs 62%[P = 0.03]和PP分别为100%vs 80%[P = 0.03])。联合治疗组的SVR率高于单药治疗组(ITT为62%vs 27%[P = 0.01],PP为73%vs 35%[P = 0.01])。接受联合疗法的患者发生严重贫血的比率明显高于接受单一疗法的患者(58%比27%; P = 0.03)。但是,联合治疗组(15%)和单一治疗组(23%)的治疗退出率相似。局限性:比较2个连续队列,而不是随机对照研究。结论:通过仔细监测血液学参数和利巴韦林剂量的修改,对于初治的慢性HCV感染透析患者,聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b和利巴韦林联合疗法比聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b单一疗法提供更高的SVR率。接受联合疗法的患者中的严重贫血明显高于接受单一疗法的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号