AGORA: THE ICJ'S KOSOVO ADVISORY OPINION - THE KOSOVO ADVISORY OPINION: CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND PRECEDENT

摘要

The somewhat surprising majority view in the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) assessing Kosovo's declaration of independence has some bearing on prospects for an eventual end to the bitter conflict between Kosovo and Serbia. It may also have some relevance for a variety of political movements around the world whose leaders might be more inclined than previously to tempt fate by declaring their people and territory to be internationally independent of the sovereign state within which they are now geographically located. Significantly, the ICJ majority sidestepped the question put to it by the General Assembly, in a move objectionable to the four dissenting judges, recasting it in such a way as to limit its response to whether Kosovo's declaration of independence, issued on February 17,2008, was "in accordance with international law" to the rather bland assertion that the declaration did not violate international law. The Court did not say, and explicitly ruled out any interpretation suggesting, that Kosovo's declaration was acceptable under international law, although by Lotus reasoning, what a state is not expressly prohibited from doing is permitted. The majority also expressed its view that the declaration was not to be viewed as deciding upon Kosovo's final status in world diplomacy.