首页> 外文期刊>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery >Comparison of best-fit circle versus contralateral comparison methods to quantify glenoid bone defect
【24h】

Comparison of best-fit circle versus contralateral comparison methods to quantify glenoid bone defect

机译:最佳圆圈与对侧比较方法的比较量化关节骨缺损

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Several measurement techniques have been reported to quantify glenoid bone defect in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Among them, the method that uses a best-fit circle and another that uses the contralateral glenoid as a control are most commonly used. However, to our knowledge, no study has been reported that compared the reliability of these methods. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to determine which of these methods has higher reproducibility.
机译:背景:据报道了几种测量技术来量化前肩部不稳定性患者的眼盂缺损。 其中,最常用的是使用最适合圆圈的方法和使用对侧关藤作为控制的另一个方法。 然而,为了我们的知识,没有报告研究,比较了这些方法的可靠性。 因此,本研究的目的是确定这些方法中哪一种具有更高的再现性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号