...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of oral rehabilitation >Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial

机译:4%茄子的疗效和不良事件与2%Lidocaine对原发性磨牙萃取的影响:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background There is no consensus regarding the most effective anaesthetic solution for children; nerve block, especially mandibular, can be difficult for general dentists. Therefore, the study aims to compare the efficacy and the adverse events of articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100 000 with lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100 000 for primary molar extraction using buccal infiltration.
机译:背景技术对儿童最有效的麻醉解决方案没有达成共识; 神经块,尤其是下颌,一般牙医可能难以困难。 因此,该研究旨在将茄子4%的疗效和不良事件与肾上腺素1:100000用肾上腺素1:100000使用颊浸润的初级摩尔萃取来比较肾上腺素1:100000。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号