...
首页> 外文期刊>Dermatologic surgery >Comparison of 532 nm Potassium Titanyl Phosphate Laser and 595 nm Pulsed Dye Laser in the Treatment of Erythematous Surgical Scars: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Study
【24h】

Comparison of 532 nm Potassium Titanyl Phosphate Laser and 595 nm Pulsed Dye Laser in the Treatment of Erythematous Surgical Scars: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Study

机译:532nM磷酸钾激光器和595nm脉冲染料激光治疗红绿性外科瘢痕的比较:随机,控制,开放标签研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUNDThe pulsed dye laser (PDL) has long been used for treatment of erythematous and hypertrophic scars. Its effectiveness has been attributed in large part to its vascular-specificity. The vascular-specific potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser has also been reported to be clinically effective for scars, but has not been compared to the PDL.OBJECTIVETo compare the safety and clinical efficacy of a 532-nm KTP laser versus a 595-nm PDL in improving the appearance of erythematous surgical scars.METHODSTwenty patients with matched bilateral erythematous surgical scars or a single linear erythematous scar measuring longer than 5 cm were enrolled in the study. Single scars were divided into equal halves with each half randomized to receive 3 successive treatments at 6-week intervals with either a 532-nm KTP laser (Excel V; Brisbane, CA) or a 595-nm PDL (Cynergy; Cynosure Inc., Chelmsford, MA) at equivalent laser parameters. Bilateral matched scars were similarly randomized to receive three 532-nm KTP or 595-nm PDL treatments. Clinical efficacy was evaluated 12 weeks after the third (final) laser treatment by independent, blinded photographic scar assessments. Secondary evaluations included final investigator and subject treatment/satisfaction assessments, Vancouver scar scale (VSS) scores, subject scar symptoms, intraoperative pain scores, and incidence of side effects.RESULTSClinical improvement of erythematous surgical scars was observed with both 532-nm KTP and 595-nm PDL systems. No statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment arms were noted in the independent, blinded photographic scar assessments, investigator and subject treatment/satisfaction assessments, subject scar symptoms, and intraoperative pain scores. The KTP arm produced statistically significant improvement for the vascularity component of the VSS only. Side effects were limited to mild treatment discomfort and minimal transient post-treatment erythema and purpura. No vesiculation, infection, scarring or other adverse events were experienced. Subject satisfaction surveys mirrored the observed clinical effects.CONCLUSIONThe-532 nm KTP laser is comparable in efficacy and safety to the 595-nm PDL laser in the treatment of erythematous surgical scars.
机译:背景技术脉冲染料激光器(PDL)已长期用于治疗红斑和肥厚瘢痕。其有效性在很大程度上归因于其血管特异性。据报道,血管特异性钾钛磷酸钛(KTP)激光器临床上对瘢痕进行临床有效,但尚未与PDL.Objectiveto进行比较,比较532-NM KTP激光与595-NM的安全性和临床疗效PDL在改善红斑外科手术瘢痕的外观。在研究中注册了匹配双侧红斑手术疤痕或单线性红斑狼疮患者的患者。单个疤痕分为等于一半,随机分为每周,以6周的间隔接收3个连续处理,其中532纳米KTP激光(Excel V; Brisbane,CA)或595nm PDL(Cynergy; Cynosure Inc.)。 Chelmsford,ma)在等效的激光参数。双侧匹配的疤痕类似地随机化,可获得三种532纳米KTP或595-NM PDL处理。临床疗效在第三(最终)激光治疗后12周评估了独立的,盲的摄影瘢痕评估。次要评估包括最终调查员和主题治疗/满意度评估,温哥华疤痕(VSS)评分,受试者瘢痕症状,术中疼痛评分和副作用的发生。用532纳米KTP和595次观察到红斑手术疤痕的结果改善。 -nm pdl系统。在独立的,蒙蔽的摄影瘢痕评估,调查员和主题治疗/满意度评估,受试者瘢痕症状和术中疼痛评分中没有统计学上没有统计学意义。 KTP臂仅为VSS的血管性分量产生了统计上显着的改进。副作用仅限于轻度治疗不适和最小的瞬态后治疗红斑和紫癜。没有经历过藻类,感染,疤痕或其他不良事件。主题满足调查反映了观察到的临床效果。结论-532nm KTP激光与595-nm PDL激光器的疗效和安全性相当,在治疗红斑手术疤痕中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号