【24h】

The Safety Trap

机译:安全陷阱

获取原文
           

摘要

In this article, we provide a model of the macroeconomic implications of safe asset shortages. In particular, we discuss the emergence of a deflationary safety trap equilibrium with endogenous risk premia. It is an acute form of a liquidity trap, in which the shortage of a specific form of assets, safe assets, as opposed to a general shortage of assets, is the fundamental driving force. At the Zero Lower Bound, our model has a Keynesian cross representation, in which net safe asset supply plays the role of an aggregate demand shifter. Essentially, safety traps correspond to liquidity traps in which the emergence of an endogenous risk premium significantly alters the connection between macroeconomic policy and economic activity. “Helicopter drops” of money, safe public debt issuances, swaps of private risky assets for safe public debt, or increases in the inflation target, stimulate aggregate demand and output, while forward guidance is less effective. The safety trap can be arbitrarily persistent, as in the secular stagnation hypothesis, despite the existence of infinitely lived assets.
机译:在本文中,我们提供了安全资产短缺的宏观经济含义的模型。特别是,我们讨论了与内源性风险预防的放气安全陷阱均衡的出现。它是一种流动性陷阱的急性形式,其中特定形式的资产形式,安全资产,而不是普遍缺乏资产,是基本驱动力。在零下限时,我们的型号具有凯恩斯人交叉代表性,其中净安全资产供应起到了总需求变速器的作用。本质上,安全陷阱对应于流动性陷阱,其中内源性危险溢价的出现显着改变了宏观经济政策和经济活动之间的联系。 “直升机跌落”金钱,安全公共债务发行,互动公共债务的私人风险资产,或增加通胀目标,刺激总需求和产出,同时前瞻性指导不太有效。尽管存在无限的资产,但安全陷阱可能是任意持续的,如在世俗的停滞假设中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号