...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease >Whither Research Domain Criteria?
【24h】

Whither Research Domain Criteria?

机译:研究域名标准?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2010, the National Institute of Mental Health launched the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDoC) as a research framework aimed at advancing research into the etiology of mental disorders, the development of clinically actionable biomarkers, and the eventual development of precision medications. The foundation of RDoC in that first phase rested in the assumption that mental disorders are brain disorders that originate in aberrant neural circuitry, and that therapeutic advances could flow from alterations in that circuitry. RDoC proposed a matrix of psychological constructs with seven levels of analysis ranging from the cell to self-report, but with neural circuitry at the center. In 2016, another model was proposed in which neural circuitry became equivalent to other units of analyses. With the advent of a new Director of the NIMH, the emphasis returned to neural circuitry as a priority, along with computational psychiatry. Have these shifts undermined the RDoC project?
机译:2010年,国家心理健康研究所推出了研究诊断标准(RDOC)作为旨在推进精神障碍病因,临床可行的生物标志物的发展的研究框架,以及精密药物的最终发展的研究框架。 RDOC的基础,在第一阶段的假设上休息,即精神障碍是源于异常神经电路的脑疾病,并且治疗进程可以从该电路的改变流动。 RDOC提出了一种心理构建体,具有七种分析水平,从细胞到自我报告,但是在中心的神经电路。 在2016年,提出了另一种模型,其中神经电路变得相当于其他分析单元。 随着NIMH新任董事的出现,重点返回神经电路作为优先级,以及计算精神病学。 这些转变是否会破坏RDOC项目?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号