首页> 外文期刊>Primary health care research & development >Physiotherapy as a first point of contact in general practice: a solution to a growing problem?
【24h】

Physiotherapy as a first point of contact in general practice: a solution to a growing problem?

机译:物理疗法作为一般实践中的第一点:解决问题的解决方案?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness, patient satisfaction and economic efficacy of a physiotherapy service providing musculoskeletal care, as an alternative to GP care. Background: There is a growing demand on general practice resources. A novel '1st Line Physiotherapy Service' was evaluated in two GP practices (inner city practice, university practice). Physiotherapy, as a first point of contact, was provided as an alternative to GP care for patients withmusculoskeletal complaints. Participants: A convenience cohort sample of over 500 patients with a musculoskeletal complaint was assessed within the physiotherapy service. For the economic evaluation a cohort of 100 GP patients was retrospectively reviewed. Method: Clinical outcome measures were collected at assessment, one and six months following assessment. Patient satisfaction was collected at assessment. An economic evaluation was undertaken on the physiotherapy cohort of patients and compared to a retrospective cohort of patients (n = 100) seen by a GP. This evaluation considered only the health care perspective (primary and secondary care). Societal issues such as absence from employment were not considered. Results: There were no adverse events associated with the physiotherapy service. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the physiotherapy service. Patients managed within the '1st Line Physiotherapy Service demonstrated clinical improvements (EQ-5D-5L, Global Rating of Change) at the six-month point. There was a statistically significant difference in favour of the physiotherapy groups using a non-parametric bootstrap test; inner city practice, mean difference in costs = (Sic) 538.01 (P = 0.006; 95% CI; (Sic)865.678, (Sic)226.98), university practice mean difference in costs = (Sic)295.83 (P = 0.044; 95% CI; (Sic)585.16, (Sic)83.69). Conclusion: The limitations of this pragmatic service evaluation are acknowledged. Nevertheless, the physiotherapy service appears to provide a safe and efficacious service. The service is well received by patients. There appear to be potential financial implications to the health economy. Physiotherapists, as a first point of contact for patients with musculoskeletal-related complaints, could contribute to the current challenges faced in primary care.
机译:目的:评估提供肌肉骨骼护理的物理治疗服务的临床效果,患者满意度和经济效益,作为GP护理的替代品。背景:对一般实践资源的需求不断增长。在两个GP实践(内部城市实践,大学练习)中评估了一部小说的'第一线物理治疗服务。作为第一个接触点的物理疗法被提供为患有血管骨骼投诉的患者的GP护理的替代品。参与者:在物理疗法服务中评估了500多个肌肉骨骼投诉患者的便利队列。对于经济评估,回顾性审查100名GP患者的队列。方法:在评估,评估后,在评估,六个月内收集临床结果措施。评估收集患者满意度。对患者的物理治疗队列进行了经济评估,并与GP看到的患者(n = 100)的回顾性队列相比。该评估仅考虑了医疗保健观点(初级和次要护理)。没有考虑缺勤的社会问题。结果:没有与物理疗法服务相关的不良事件。患者对物理治疗服务报告了高度满意度。在“第一线”物理疗法中管理的患者在六个月点展示了临床改进(EQ-5D-5L,全球变化的额定值)。使用非参数释放测试对物理疗法组有统计学显着的差异;内部城市实践,成本平均差异=(SIC)538.01(P = 0.006;(SIC)865.678,(SIC)226.98),大学练习意味着成本=(SIC)295.83(P = 0.044; 95 %CI;(SIC)585.16,(SIC)83.69)。结论:承认了这一实用服务评估的局限性。尽管如此,物理治疗服务似乎提供了安全而有效的服务。该服务是患者受到欢迎的。似乎潜在对健康经济的财务影响。作为肌肉骨骼相关投诉患者的第一个接触点的物理治疗师可能导致初级保健所面临的当前挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号