首页> 外文期刊>Pain management nursing: official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses >Reference Values of Grip Strength, Prevalence of Low Grip Strength, and Factors Affecting Grip Strength Values in Chinese Adults
【24h】

Reference Values of Grip Strength, Prevalence of Low Grip Strength, and Factors Affecting Grip Strength Values in Chinese Adults

机译:握力的参考值,低握力患病率,以及影响中国成人握力值的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2017 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine ? 2017 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine Objectives The objectives of this study were to update the reference values of grip strength, to estimate the prevalence of low grip strength, and to examine the impact of different aspects of measurement protocol on grip strength values in Chinese adults. Design, Setting, and Participants A cross-sectional survey of Chinese men (n = 714) and women (n = 4014) aged 18–102 years was undertaken in different community settings in Hong Kong. Measurements Grip strength was measured with a digital dynamometer (TKK 5401 Grip-D; Takei, Niigata, Japan). Low grip strength was defined as grip strength 2 standard deviations or more below the mean for young adults. The effects of measurement protocol on grip strength values were examined in a subsample of 45 men and women with repeated measures of grip strength taken with a hydraulic dynamometer (Baseline; Fabrication Enterprises Inc, Irvington, NY), using pair t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland and Altman plots. Results Grip strength was greater among men than among women (P .001) and the rate of decline differed between sexes (P .001). The prevalence of low grip strength also increased with age, reaching a rate of 16.5% in men and 20.6% in women aged 65+. Although the TKK digital dynamometer gave higher grip strength values than the Baseline hydraulic dynamometer (P .001), the degree of agreement between the 2 dynamometers was satisfactory. Higher grip strength values were also observed when the measurement was performed with the elbow extended in a standing position, compared with that with the elbow flexed at 90° in a sitting position, using the same dynamometer (P .05). Conclusions This study updated the reference values of grip strength and estimated the prevalence of low grip strength among Chinese adults spanning a wide age range. These findings might be useful for risk estimation and evaluation of interventions. However, grip strength measurements should be interpreted with caution, as grip strength values can be affected by type of dynamometer used, assessment posture, and elbow position. Objectives The objectives of this study were to update the reference values of grip strength, to estimate the prevalence of low grip strength, and to examine the impact of different aspects of measurement protocol on grip strength values in Chinese adults. Design, Setting, and Participants A cross-sectional survey of Chinese men (n = 714) and women (n = 4014) aged 18–102 years was undertaken in different community settings in Hong Kong. Measurements Grip strength was measured with a digital dynamometer (TKK 5401 Grip-D; Takei, Niigata, Japan). Low grip strength was defined as grip strength 2 standard deviations or more below the mean for young adults. The effects of measurement protocol on grip strength values were examined in a subsample of 45 men and women with repeated measures of grip strength taken with a hydraulic dynamometer (Baseline; Fabrication Enterprises Inc, Irvington, NY), using pair t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland and Altman plots. Results Grip strength was greater among men than among women (P <.001) and the rate of decline differed between sexes (P <.001). The prevalence of low grip strength also increased with age, reaching a rate of 16.5% in men and 20.6% in women aged 65+. Although the TKK digital dynamometer gave higher grip strength values than the Baseline hydraulic dynamometer (P <.001), the degree of agreement between the 2 dynamometers was satisfactory. Higher grip strength values were also observed when the measurement was performed with the elbow extended in a standing position, compared with that with the elbow flexed at 90° in a sitting position, using the same dynamometer (P <.05). Conclusions This study updated the reference values of grip strength and estimated the
机译:还2017年AMDA - 后急性和长期护理医学协会? 2017年AMDA - 急性和长期护理医学的社会目标本研究的目的是更新握力强度的参考值,估计低握力的普及,并检查测量不同方面的影响中国成人握力值的协议。在香港的不同社区环境中,设计,环境和参与者对18-102岁的女性(n = 714)和女性(n = 4014)进行了横断面调查。测量夹具用数字测功机(TKK 5401 Grip-D; Takei,Niigata,日本)测量。低抓握强度被定义为握力2标准偏差或更高的年轻成年人的平均值。在45名男性和女性的子样本中检查了测量方案对握力值的影响,采用液压测功机(基线;制造企业INC,IRVINGTON,NY),使用对T-TEST,腹部相关性系数,和平淡和奥特曼图。结果男性中的握力大于女性(P& .001),性别之间的下降率(p <.001)。低握力强度的患病率也随着年龄的增长而增加,65岁以上的男性达到16.5%的速度和20.6%。尽管TKK数字测功机具有比基线液压测功机更高的握力值(P&LT; .001),但2个测力器之间的一致性令人满意。当用肘部延伸到站立位置的肘部进行测量时,还观察到较高的抓握强度值,与在坐姿90°处的肘部弯曲的弯头,使用相同的测功机(P <。05)。结论本研究更新了握力强度的参考值,并估计中国成人跨越广泛范围的低握力的患病率。这些调查结果可能对风险估算和对干预措施的评估有用。然而,应谨慎地解释握力测量,因为握力值可以受测量器类型,评估姿势和肘部位置的影响。目的本研究的目的是更新握力强度的参考值,估计低握力强度的普及,并研究了测量方案对中国成人握力值的不同方面的影响。在香港的不同社区环境中,设计,环境和参与者对18-102岁的女性(n = 714)和女性(n = 4014)进行了横断面调查。测量夹具用数字测功机(TKK 5401 Grip-D; Takei,Niigata,日本)测量。低抓握强度被定义为握力2标准偏差或更高的年轻成年人的平均值。在45名男性和女性的子样本中检查了测量方案对握力值的影响,采用液压测功机(基线;制造企业INC,IRVINGTON,NY),使用对T-TEST,腹部相关性系数,和平淡和奥特曼图。结果男性握力大于女性(P <.001),性别之间的下降率(P <.001)。低握力强度的患病率也随着年龄的增长而增加,65岁以上的男性达到16.5%的速度和20.6%。尽管TKK数字测功机具有比基线液压测功机更高的握力值(P <.001),但2个测力器之间的一致性令人满意。当用肘部在立式位置延伸时测量时,还观察到较高的抓握强度值,与肘部弯曲在坐姿的90°处,使用相同的测功机(P <.05)。结论本研究更新了握力强度的参考值并估计

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号