...
首页> 外文期刊>Sleep >Agreement between self-reported and objectively measured sleep duration among white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese adults in the United States: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
【24h】

Agreement between self-reported and objectively measured sleep duration among white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese adults in the United States: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

机译:在美国的自我报告和客观测量睡眠期间的协议,在美国,在美国的中国成人之间:多民族研究动脉粥样硬化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract, Study Objectives: To identify systematic biases across groups in objectively and subjectively measured sleep duration. Methods: We investigated concordance of self-reported habitual sleep duration compared with actigraphy- and single-night in-home polysomnography (PSG) across white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Results: Among 1910 adults, self-reported sleep duration, determined by differences between bed and wake times, was overestimated in all racial groups compared with PSG and actigraphy. Compared with whites (p = 0.45), correlations were significantly lower only in blacks (p = 0.28). Self-reporting bias for total sleep time compared with wrist actigraphy was 66 min (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61-71) for whites, 58 min (95% CI: 48-69) for blacks, 66 min (95% CI: 57-74) for Hispanics, and 60 min (95% CI: 49-70) for Chinese adults. Compared with PSG, self-reporting bias in whites at 73 min (95% CI: 67-79) was higher than in blacks (54 min [95% CI: 42-65]) and Chinese (49 min [95% CI: 37-61]) but not different from Hispanics (67 min [95% CI: 56-78]). Slight agreement/concordance was observed between self-reported and actigraphy-based total sleep time (kw = 0.14 for whites, 0.10 for blacks, 0.17 for Hispanics, and 0.11 for Chinese) and PSG (kw = 0.08 for whites, 0.04 for blacks, 0.05 for Hispanics, and 0.01 for Chinese) across race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Self-reported sleep duration overestimated objectively measured sleep across all races, and compared with PSG, overestimation is significantly greater in whites compared with blacks. Larger reporting bias reduces the ability to identify significant associations between sleep duration and health among blacks compared with whites. Sleep measurement property differences should be considered when comparing sleep indices across racial/ethnic groups
机译:摘要,研究目标:以客观和主观测量的睡眠持续时间识别跨组的系统偏见。方法:我们调查了自我报告的习惯性睡眠持续时间的一致性与白色,黑人,西班牙裔和中国参与者在动脉粥样硬化的多民族研究中的杂志和季节性夜间多核园(PSG)相比。结果:1910年成年人,与床和唤醒时间之间的差异决定的自我报告的睡眠持续时间,与PSG和Actigraphy相比,所有种族群体中受到高估。与白人相比(p = 0.45),只有黑色显着较低(p = 0.28)。与腕部总睡眠时间的自我报告偏见是66分钟(95%置信区间[CI]:61-71),黑人58分钟(95%CI:48-69),66分钟(95% CI:57-74)对于西班牙裔人和中国成人60分钟(95%CI:49-70)。与PSG相比,在73分钟(95%CI:67-79)的白金中的自我报告偏差高于黑色(54分钟[95%CI:42-65])和中文(49分钟[95%CI: 37-61])但与西班牙语没有什么不同(67分钟[95%CI:56-78])。在自我报告和激光的总睡眠时间之间观察到轻微的协议/一致性(白人KW = 0.14,黑人0.10,西班牙裔0.17,为0.11)和PSG(KW = 0.08为白人,黑人为0.04,0.04,西班牙裔美国人的西班牙裔人为0.05和跨越种族/种族的0.01)。结论:自我报告的睡眠持续时间过度估​​计,客观地测量所有种族的睡眠,与PSG相比,与黑人相比,白人的估计率明显更大。与白人相比,较大的报告偏见减少了识别黑人睡眠持续时间和健康之间的重要关联的能力。在比较种族/民族群体的睡眠指数时,应考虑睡眠测量性质差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号